Research Article

Public Sentiment Analysis on the POGO Hearings Involving Alice Guo: A Corpus-Based Sentiment Analysis of Filipino Netizens

682 reads
Psych Educ Multidisc J, 2026, 52 (7), 865-873, DOI: https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.520710, ISSN 2822-4353
Verified on SciChain · token #7259 of SciMatic Articles (ERC-1155, 1,000,000 tokens)
Contract 0x0E596B4b…F05eF8 · mint transaction · verify the record
Proof of record · recorded 2026-10-17 · anchored on SciChain · Verify (opens in a new tab) · record

Abstract

This study explored the sentiments of Filipino netizens toward the POGO hearings involving former Mayor Alice Guo, who faced allegations of corruption, identity fraud, and foreign influence. Using a qualitative sentiment analysis integrated with corpus linguistics, 3,000 social media comments from Facebook, TikTok, and YouTube were analyzed through computational tools to identify lexical patterns and sentiment polarity. The findings show that public discourse was predominantly negative (70%), characterized by condemnation, distrust, and frustration, while neutral (18%) and positive (12%) sentiments reflected analytical positions, empathy, and limited support. Thematic analysis revealed five dominant concerns—judicial inaction, systemic corruption, identity fraud, erosion of public confidence, and heightened public scrutiny—underscoring widespread dissatisfaction with governance and institutional accountability. Overall, the study contributes to understanding digital political discourse in the Philippine context by demonstrating how emotional and moral evaluations shape public opinion and civic engagement.

Keywords sentiment analysis philippines public sentiment Filipino netizens social media reactions
Authors 2
View Publication Certificate Order a Printed Certificate For this article's authors: $50.00 ($35.00 to the Philippines), shipping included. View PDF Cite This Article Back to Archives

The team behind this paper

2 authors, 1 institution.

This paper St. John Paul II College of Davao — Philippines St. John Paul II Colleg… 2 authors Trixie Lumintad — corresponding author TL Trixie Lumintad ✉ Louie Jay Caloc LC Louie Jay Caloc

Readership

683 reads over 10 months.

February 2026 November 2026

On SciChain

This article is token #7259 of SciMatic Articles (ERC-1155): 1,000,000 tokens, minted once, never more. The chain also stores a fingerprint (SHA-256) of the article's record, so anyone can check that it has not been altered.

HolderWalletTokens
SciMatic 0xc35709…277732 100,000 (10%)
Trixie Lumintad 0x1E1547…f9B434 450,000 (45%)
Louie Jay Caloc 0x6571D0…d74d93 450,000 (45%)
Content hash 0xe13b820a1729ce08161839b67e4eb774f408347a0a52b0f199dd4d0c144b4d7a

Bibliographic Information

Trixie Lumintad, Louie Jay Caloc, (2026). Public Sentiment Analysis on the POGO Hearings Involving Alice Guo: A Corpus-Based Sentiment Analysis of Filipino Netizens, Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 52(7): 865-873
Bibtex Citation
@article{trixie_lumintad2026pemj,
author = {Trixie Lumintad and Louie Jay Caloc},
title = {Public Sentiment Analysis on the POGO Hearings Involving Alice Guo: A Corpus-Based Sentiment Analysis of Filipino Netizens},
journal = {Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal},
year = {2026},
volume = {52},
number = {7},
pages = {865-873},
doi = {10.70838/pemj.520710},
url = {https://scimatic.org/show_manuscript/7259}
}
APA Citation
Lumintad, T., Caloc, L.J., (2026). Public Sentiment Analysis on the POGO Hearings Involving Alice Guo: A Corpus-Based Sentiment Analysis of Filipino Netizens. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 52(7), 865-873. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.520710

Author Information

  • To change your profile photo, login to scimatic.org, go to your profile and change the photo.
  • Any photo that shows your face will do: we crop it to your head and shoulders and give it a plain background automatically.
  • To sign in, go to Sign in and enter the e-mail address registered with the article: we e-mail you a one-time sign-in link (there is no password).
  • In case of any other problem, contact your editor directly or write to us at info @ scimatic.org