Research Article

SHS TVL Students’ Perceptions of Fair and Objective Assessment Tools

462 reads
Psych Educ Multidisc J, 2025, 30 (4), 707-725, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14614764, ISSN 2822-4353
Verified on SciChain · token #4291 of SciMatic Articles (ERC-1155, 1,000,000 tokens)
Contract 0x0E596B4b…F05eF8 · mint transaction · verify the record

Abstract

This study investigated the perceptions of fairness and objectivity of assessment tools used in senior high school among students. The research employed a phenomenological design. Fifteen (15 students were selected using purposive sampling. The results indicated that students' experiences with assessment tools, such as performance tasks and written examinations, were crucial to their learning process. Several factors were identified to improve perceptions of fairness and objectivity in Technical-Vocational-Livelihood assessments: clear and comprehensible instruction, a balance between task difficulty and engagement, relevant feedback, instructional relevance and equity, engaging content, fair grading practices, and curriculum balance. This study highlights the multifaceted aspects of students' perceptions of fairness and objectivity in competency-based assessments. The recommendations provided by the participants offer valuable insights into enhancing the assessment experience for students and teachers involved in Technical-Vocational-Livelihood (TVL) subjects.

Keywords teaching assessment tool Senior High School TVL student assessment
Authors 5

The team behind this paper

5 authors, 4 institutions.

This paper Learners’ Involvement of Community Partnership and their Attitudes Toward Learning Learners’ Involvement o… 1 author Department of Education — Philippines Department of Education 2 authors Ditsaan Ramain — Philippines Ditsaan Ramain 1 author Capitol University — Philippines Capitol University 1 author John Louie Esoy — corresponding author JE John Louie Esoy ✉ Namerod Bual NB Namerod Bual Merlinda Buno MB Merlinda Buno Nahar Pinto NP Nahar Pinto Olga Alonsabe OA Olga Alonsabe

Readership

462 reads over 22 months.

January 2025 October 2026

On SciChain

This article is token #4291 of SciMatic Articles (ERC-1155): 1,000,000 tokens, minted once, never more. The chain also stores a fingerprint (SHA-256) of the article's record, so anyone can check that it has not been altered.

HolderWalletTokens
SciMatic 0xc35709…277732 100,000 (10%)
John Louie Esoy 0x62DAb8…29Bd3C 180,000 (18%)
Namerod Bual 0xc4c9fD…F55837 180,000 (18%)
Merlinda Buno 0xe2b3B1…4Ac48a 180,000 (18%)
Nahar Pinto 0x104252…26ACAa 180,000 (18%)
Olga Alonsabe 0x7462d5…811FCf 180,000 (18%)
Content hash 0xebc907b3ca8079215e5f0f653f0483440ec7b4b4a9e76dc39b4ce616d74a8c9a

Bibliographic Information

John Louie Esoy, Namerod Bual, Merlinda Buno, Nahar Pinto, Olga Alonsabe, (2025). SHS TVL Students’ Perceptions of Fair and Objective Assessment Tools, Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 30(4): 707-725
Bibtex Citation
@article{john_louie_esoy2025pemj,
author = {John Louie Esoy and Namerod Bual and Merlinda Buno and Nahar Pinto and Olga Alonsabe},
title = {SHS TVL Students’ Perceptions of Fair and Objective Assessment Tools},
journal = {Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal},
year = {2025},
volume = {30},
number = {4},
pages = {707-725},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.14614764},
url = {https://scimatic.org/show_manuscript/4291}
}
APA Citation
Esoy, J.L., Bual, N., Buno, M., Pinto, N., Alonsabe, O., (2025). SHS TVL Students’ Perceptions of Fair and Objective Assessment Tools. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 30(4), 707-725. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14614764

Author Information

  • To change your profile photo, login to scimatic.org, go to your profile and change the photo.
  • Provide a face photo, and not full body.
  • It is better to remove the background from your photo. Go to Remove Background and then upload to profile
  • If you are unable to login, go to Reset My Password provide your email registered with the article and get new password.
  • In case of any other problem, contact your editor directly or write to us at info @ scimatic.org