Research Article

Development, Validation and Acceptability of Modular Teaching Evaluation Tool for Teachers (MTETT)

788 reads
Psych Educ Multidisc J, 2023, 6 (8), 671-673, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7502643, ISSN 2822-4353
Verified on SciChain · token #931 of SciMatic Articles (ERC-1155, 1,000,000 tokens)
Contract 0x0E596B4b…F05eF8 · mint transaction · verify the record
Proof of record · recorded 2026-10-17 · anchored on SciChain · Verify (opens in a new tab) · record

Abstract

The formal process that a school uses to review and rate teachers' effectiveness in the classroom is referred to as teacher evaluation. However, in the New Normal, face-to-face instruction is prohibited, and teacher evaluation takes place online. However, not all teachers are involved in Online Distance Learning, and a number of teachers are under Modular, so there is a need to develop a tool to evaluate the performance of teachers who are engaged in the Modular Learning Modality. The researcher developed a Modular Teaching Evaluation Tool for Teachers (MTETT) and have it evaluated by one (1) principal and six (6) Master Teachers in the Division of Rizal based on the Clearness of Criteria and Presentation. Both Clearness of Criteria and Presentation variables got a mean of 4 verbally interpreted as Very Satisfactory and Very Acceptable, and the evaluators' recommendations were nearly identical. They want to pilot test the MTETT with other schools. Furthermore, because there is no prescribed evaluation tool for teachers engaged in the Modular Learning Modality, the tool can be submitted to the Division for evaluation and possible implementation once evaluated. The school principal and master teachers have the same evaluation on having the MTETT be used and shared with other schools for pilot testing.

Keywords validation development acceptability modular learning Evaluation Tool
Author 1

The team behind this paper

1 author, 1 institution.

This paper Rizal National Science High School — Philippines Rizal National Science … 1 author Arlene Paralejas — corresponding author AP Arlene Paralejas ✉

Readership

484 reads over 34 months.

February 2024 November 2026

On SciChain

This article is token #931 of SciMatic Articles (ERC-1155): 1,000,000 tokens, minted once, never more. The chain also stores a fingerprint (SHA-256) of the article's record, so anyone can check that it has not been altered.

HolderWalletTokens
SciMatic 0xc35709…277732 100,000 (10%)
Arlene Paralejas 0xBEF4F1…416104 900,000 (90%)
Content hash 0x3a0c51d4bcb19856d58522c743e55ce29b31234530c66e834b7bdce0b20b990b

Bibliographic Information

Arlene Paralejas (2023). Development, Validation and Acceptability of Modular Teaching Evaluation Tool for Teachers (MTETT), Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(8): 671-673
Bibtex Citation
@article{arlene_paralejas2023pemj,
author = {Arlene Paralejas},
title = {Development, Validation and Acceptability of Modular Teaching Evaluation Tool for Teachers (MTETT)},
journal = {Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal},
year = {2023},
volume = {6},
number = {8},
pages = {671-673},
doi = {10.5281/zenodo.7502643},
url = {https://scimatic.org/show_manuscript/931}
}
APA Citation
Paralejas, A., (2023). Development, Validation and Acceptability of Modular Teaching Evaluation Tool for Teachers (MTETT). Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(8), 671-673. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7502643

Author Information

  • To change your profile photo, login to scimatic.org, go to your profile and change the photo.
  • Any photo that shows your face will do: we crop it to your head and shoulders and give it a plain background automatically.
  • To sign in, go to Sign in and enter the e-mail address registered with the article: we e-mail you a one-time sign-in link (there is no password).
  • In case of any other problem, contact your editor directly or write to us at info @ scimatic.org