Research Article

Tapestry Experiences: Modular vs Face-to-Face Teaching-Learning

77 reads
Psych Educ Multidisc J, 2026, 64 (6), 700-721, DOI: https://doi.org/10.70838/PEMJ.640605, ISSN 2822-4353
Verified on SciChain · token #11099 of SciMatic Articles (ERC-1155, 1,000,000 tokens)
Contract 0x0E596B4b…F05eF8 · mint transaction · verify the record
Proof of record · recorded 2026-10-17 · anchored on SciChain · Verify (opens in a new tab) · record
Peer-review record: 1 review (1 human, 0 AI)

Abstract

The study aimed to explore the comparison of modular and face-to-face Junior High School teaching-learning in English, Math and Science at Patupat National High School, School Year 2023-2024. Specifically, the study sought answers to the following queries: (1) grades of the research participants in Grades 8 and 9 English, Grades 8 and 9 Math, and Grades 8 and 9 Science; (2) the significant difference in the final grades of the research participants in Grades 8 and 9 English, Grades 8 and 9 Math, and Grades 8 and 9 Science; (3) the experiences of the research participants in modular teaching learning in English, Math and Science and face-to-face teaching learning in English, Math and Science; and (4) the coping strategies of the research participants in the modular and face-to-face teaching-learning in English, Math and Science. Hence, this study utilized the mixed-methods sequential explanatory design, which consists of two distinct phases – the quantitative followed by qualitative. The findings of the study are that the final grades of the research participants showed that the transition from modular distance teaching-learning to face-to-face teaching-learning significantly impacts student performance across English, Math, and Science subjects. Moreover, there is a significant difference in performance between modular distance teaching-learning (Grade 8) and face-to-face teaching-learning (Grade 9) with respect to the research participants’ grades in the three core subjects – English, Math and Science. The increase in the performance of students in English, Math and Science was statistically significant. In conclusion, both modular distance teaching-learning and face-to-face teaching-learning modalities generated various learning experiences and coping strategies and mechanisms in learning acquisition of the students. However, the observed differences between the two teaching-learning modalities suggest that the traditional classroom setting of face-to-face teaching-learning, where students get to personally interact with their teachers in a productive environment, provides benefits, advantages, and positive learning experiences more for the learners. Thus, it eventually contributes to higher academic achievement of the students in the three subjects or learning areas, which include English, Math, and Science.
Keywords junior high school Learning Modalities modular distance teaching-learning face-to-face teaching-learning mixed-methods sequential explanatory design
Authors 2
View Publication Certificate Order a Printed Certificate For this article's authors: $50.00 ($35.00 to the Philippines), shipping included. View PDF Cite This Article Back to Archives

The team behind this paper

2 authors, 2 institutions.

This paper Patupat National High School Department of Education — Philippines Patupat National High S… 1 author San Remigio National High School Department of Education — Philippines San Remigio National Hi… 1 author Cheryl Ann Cañete-Zapanta — corresponding author CC Cheryl Ann Cañete-Zapanta ✉ Rhyjel Godinez-Marigomen RG Rhyjel Godinez-Marigomen

Readership

77 reads over 2 months.

October 2026 November 2026

On SciChain

This article is token #11099 of SciMatic Articles (ERC-1155): 1,000,000 tokens, minted once, never more. The chain also stores a fingerprint (SHA-256) of the article's record, so anyone can check that it has not been altered.

HolderWalletTokens
SciMatic 0xc35709…277732 100,000 (10%)
Cheryl Ann Cañete-Zapanta 0xc2290C…903cB9 450,000 (45%)
Rhyjel Godinez-Marigomen 0x7a1d52…Ec8220 450,000 (45%)
Content hash 0x10759db5bf0ef149ebfa057c09310001970d729d8f21e8650b676dd5b366f04c

Bibliographic Information

Cheryl Ann Cañete-Zapanta, Rhyjel Godinez-Marigomen, (2026). Tapestry Experiences: Modular vs Face-to-Face Teaching-Learning, Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 64(6): 700-721
Bibtex Citation
@article{cheryl_ann_cañete-zapanta2026pemj,
author = {Cheryl Ann Cañete-Zapanta and Rhyjel Godinez-Marigomen},
title = {Tapestry Experiences: Modular vs Face-to-Face Teaching-Learning},
journal = {Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal},
year = {2026},
volume = {64},
number = {6},
pages = {700-721},
doi = {10.70838/PEMJ.640605},
url = {https://scimatic.org/show_manuscript/11099}
}
APA Citation
Cañete-Zapanta, C.A., Godinez-Marigomen, R., (2026). Tapestry Experiences: Modular vs Face-to-Face Teaching-Learning. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 64(6), 700-721. https://doi.org/10.70838/PEMJ.640605

Author Information

  • To change your profile photo, login to scimatic.org, go to your profile and change the photo.
  • Any photo that shows your face will do: we crop it to your head and shoulders and give it a plain background automatically.
  • To sign in, go to Sign in and enter the e-mail address registered with the article: we e-mail you a one-time sign-in link (there is no password).
  • In case of any other problem, contact your editor directly or write to us at info @ scimatic.org