Psych Educ Multidisc J,
2026,
62 (5),
546-552,
doi: 10.70838/pemj.620503,
ISSN 2822-4353
Abstract
This study aims to demonstrate that disobedience in Eros and Psyche and Orpheus and Eurydice instead expresses unconscious psychological conflict rooted in desire, repression, and anxiety. Using a Freudian psychoanalytic framework, the analysis applies close textual reading to each myth's pivotal transgressive moment, coding Psyche's lamp scene and Orpheus's backward glance according to the dynamics of the id, ego, and superego. The findings reveal two opposing outcomes. Psyche's defiance follows a trajectory of ego maturation: her curiosity, driven by unconscious desire (id), passes through prohibition (superego) into an act of knowing that consolidates rather than destroys. Orpheus's glance, by contrast, represents the collapse of egoic regulation under unresolved grief, enacting the death drive (Thanatos) as a compulsion to reunite with the lost object. These divergent results — ego integration versus ego dissolution — offer a typology of how unconscious conflict shapes transgression in love narratives. The paper extends existing psychoanalytic myth criticism by moving beyond character-level interpretation to identify the specific intrapsychic structures that produce disobedience, revealing these myths as allegories of psychological processes that remain active in contemporary experiences of love and loss.
Keywords
unconscious conflict
Freudian psychoanalysis
Eros and Psyche
Orpheus and Eurydice
Death drive
greek mythology
ego psychology
repression