Research Article

Comparative Effectiveness of Rewriting and Electronic Flashcards on Students’ Test Performance: A Pretest-Posttest Experimental Study

49 reads
Psych Educ Multidisc J, 2026, 58 (8), 1118-1124, doi: 10.70838/pemj.580807, ISSN 2822-4353

Abstract

Identifying effective study strategies remained a significant concern in education, particularly in improving students’ academic performance and learning outcomes. This study examined the comparative effectiveness of lesson rewriting and electronic flashcards on students’ test performance. Guided by principles from cognitive psychology, the study employed a quantitative pretest-posttest between-subjects experimental design. A total of 30 college students were selected through convenience sampling and were divided into two groups: rewriting and electronic flashcards. Academic performance was measured using standardized pretest and posttest assessments. Descriptive statistics, paired samples t-tests, and independent samples t-tests were utilized to analyze differences within and between groups. Results revealed a statistically significant improvement in the test scores of students who used the rewriting method, indicating meaningful gains in comprehension and retention. In contrast, the electronic flashcards group showed only slight improvement, which was not statistically significant within the intervention period. Furthermore, no statistically significant difference was found between the posttest scores of the two groups, suggesting that both study methods produced comparable learning outcomes under controlled conditions. The findings suggested that rewriting supported deeper cognitive processing through generative learning, while electronic flashcards primarily reinforced retrieval and familiarity with information. The study concluded that both strategies were beneficial depending on the learning objectives and nature of the subject matter. However, the findings should be interpreted cautiously due to the small sample size and short intervention period. The study provided evidence-based insights that might assist students, educators, and educational institutions in selecting appropriate and cognitively engaging study strategies aligned with quality education initiatives.
Keywords: academic performance, retrieval practice, study strategies, lesson rewriting, electronic flashcards, generative learning
Default avatar

Blockchain Confirmation

Loading...
If you want to upload this article to SciMatic Hybrid Blockchain, install MetaMask extension to your web browser, create a wallet and buy SCI coins at SciMatic using credit or contact your country coordinator.
One article costs 10 SCI coins to be in the Blockchain. Buy SCI Coins

Bibliographic Information

Christine Julia Castillo, Francezka Gwyneth Arbes, Hannah Raphaella Labares, Bernadeth Marinay, Cherry Mae Moncatar, Mc Alexander Ember Tadifa, Darwin Diola, Josh Marc Mendoza, (2026). Comparative Effectiveness of Rewriting and Electronic Flashcards on Students’ Test Performance: A Pretest-Posttest Experimental Study, Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 58(8): 1118-1124
Bibtex Citation
@article{christine_julia_castillo2026pemj,
author = {Christine Julia Castillo and Francezka Gwyneth Arbes and Hannah Raphaella Labares and Bernadeth Marinay and Cherry Mae Moncatar and Mc Alexander Ember Tadifa and Darwin Diola and Josh Marc Mendoza},
title = {Comparative Effectiveness of Rewriting and Electronic Flashcards on Students’ Test Performance: A Pretest-Posttest Experimental Study},
journal = {Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal},
year = {2026},
volume = {58},
number = {8},
pages = {1118-1124},
doi = {10.70838/pemj.580807},
url = {https://scimatic.org/show_manuscript/8226}
}
APA Citation
Castillo, C.J., Arbes, F.G., Labares, H.R., Marinay, B., Moncatar, C.M., Tadifa, M.A.E., Diola, D., Mendoza, J.M., (2026). Comparative Effectiveness of Rewriting and Electronic Flashcards on Students’ Test Performance: A Pretest-Posttest Experimental Study. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 58(8), 1118-1124. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.580807

Author Information

  • To change your profile photo, login to scimatic.org, go to your profile and change the photo.
  • Provide a face photo, and not full body.
  • It is better to remove the background from your photo. Go to Remove Background and then upload to profile
  • If you are unable to login, go to Reset My Password provide your email registered with the article and get new password.
  • In case of any other problem, contact your editor directly or write to us at info @ scimatic.org