Abstract
This study examined personality development through a humanistic lens, focusing on how individuals interpret and construct their sense of self through personal experiences and social contexts. Drawing on the theoretical frameworks of Abraham Maslow, Carl Rogers, and George Kelly, the research aimed to understand personality as a dynamic, evolving construct shaped by relationships, challenges, and internal reflection. The investigation addressed gaps in culturally grounded applications of humanistic psychology, particularly in the Philippine context. A qualitative narrative design was employed to capture the lived experiences of eleven participants residing in Dagupan, Pangasinan. Using purposive sampling, the study selected individuals with varied backgrounds to explore diverse developmental trajectories. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis, supported by NVivo software for systematic coding and organization. Themes were derived to align with the study’s research questions concerning definitions, processes, and influences related to personality development. Findings revealed that participants viewed personality as the product of both intrinsic traits and ongoing external influences. Key developmental factors included early family dynamics, religious and educational experiences, and emotionally significant life events. Participants consistently described personality as adaptable, evolving in response to changing roles, social expectations, and personal growth. The results affirmed humanistic psychology’s core assertion that personality is not fixed but is actively constructed through conscious engagement with one’s environment. The study concluded that personality development is a lifelong, context-sensitive process that integrates internal dispositions with social learning. The humanistic emphasis on agency, meaning-making, and authentic relationships was reflected in all participant narratives. These conclusions supported the development of culturally relevant strategies for educators, counselors, and community leaders to foster environments that nurture individual potential. Further research was recommended to extend these findings across other regions and demographic groups.
