Research Article

Traditional vs. Animated Videos: Effective Ways to Learning Literary Works among Students

113 reads
Psych Educ Multidisc J, 2025, 36 (4), 466-474, doi: 10.70838/pemj.360409, ISSN 2822-4353

Abstract

This study aimed to determine and evaluate the effectiveness of two learning methods—traditional reading and animated videos—in teaching literary works to 7th-grade students. A descriptive-comparative research design was employed to analyze the significant differences between these two approaches. To collect data, the study utilized checklists and multiple-choice questionnaires based on selected literary works, allowing for a structured assessment of student learning outcomes. The findings revealed that while both traditional reading and animated videos play a role in enhancing students' understanding of literary works, there is a significant difference in their effectiveness. Comparative analysis showed that animated videos had a greater impact on students’ emotional engagement and critical thinking skills than traditional methods. The data indicated that students who learned through animated videos demonstrated a deeper connection with the material and a stronger ability to analyze literary texts. This suggests that multimedia-based learning, particularly through animation, can enhance comprehension and engagement compared to conventional reading approaches. Given these results, the study highlights the potential benefits of integrating animated videos into literature instruction. Educators may consider incorporating multimedia resources to complement traditional teaching methods, fostering a more engaging and effective learning experience. Future research is encouraged to explore other factors influencing students’ literary comprehension and to examine the long-term effects of multimedia-assisted learning in literature education.

Keywords: learning, method, traditional, literary works, animated videos

Blockchain Confirmation

Loading...
If you want to upload this article to SciMatic Hybrid Blockchain, install MetaMask extension to your web browser, create a wallet and buy SCI coins at SciMatic using credit or contact your country coordinator.
One article costs 10 SCI coins to be in the Blockchain. Buy SCI Coins

Bibliographic Information

Erika Lj Misa, Desserie Mae Garan, Cristina Sotomayor, Daren Deleon, Ramon Christopher Badillos, Shaina Tobtob, Karen Francisco, John Carl Froi Carpo, Shelbert Lloyd Duncil, (2025). Traditional vs. Animated Videos: Effective Ways to Learning Literary Works among Students, Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 36(4): 466-474
Bibtex Citation
@article{erika_lj_misa2025pemj,
author = {Erika Lj Misa and Desserie Mae Garan and Cristina Sotomayor and Daren Deleon and Ramon Christopher Badillos and Shaina Tobtob and Karen Francisco and John Carl Froi Carpo and Shelbert Lloyd Duncil},
title = {Traditional vs. Animated Videos: Effective Ways to Learning Literary Works among Students},
journal = {Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal},
year = {2025},
volume = {36},
number = {4},
pages = {466-474},
doi = {10.70838/pemj.360409},
url = {https://scimatic.org/show_manuscript/5044}
}
APA Citation
Misa, E.L., Garan, D.M., Sotomayor, C., Deleon, D., Badillos, R.C., Tobtob, S., Francisco, K., Carpo, J.C.F., Duncil, S.L., (2025). Traditional vs. Animated Videos: Effective Ways to Learning Literary Works among Students. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 36(4), 466-474. https://doi.org/10.70838/pemj.360409

Author Information

  • To change your profile photo, login to scimatic.org, go to your profile and change the photo.
  • Provide a face photo, and not full body.
  • It is better to remove the background from your photo. Go to Remove Background and then upload to profile
  • If you are unable to login, go to Reset My Password provide your email registered with the article and get new password.
  • In case of any other problem, contact your editor directly or write to us at info @ scimatic.org