Ethics, Standards & Responsibilities

The Journal of Ongoing Educational Research is meant to do the following: 

This Journal aims to print high-quality studies in science, psychology, teaching, learning, and other areas of education that are making progress right now. As a peer-reviewed magazine, one of our primary goals is to ensure that high printing standards are met. Publication ethics are critical; editors, peer reviewers, and writers should pay close attention to ensure they meet ethical standards.

Policy for Open Access

The Journal of Ongoing Educational Research aims to make open-access research studies more well-known and easier to use. Readers and their organizations can get internet access without paying a fee, give information about themselves, or log in. Our Journal's open-access policy says that all readers can read, download, copy, share, print, link to, and find our papers for free. 

To the Editors of JOER 

           Editors should be careful not to treat writers differently because of their gender, religion, political views, ethnicity, or origin. They should treat all pieces similarly and only look at their educational value. Every application to the JOER should be judged the same way, and issues about ethics should be handled in the following ways: Any immoral behavior or wrongdoing that editors hear about or see should be carefully considered. Getting to the bottom of the problem should take more steps. Any case that seems odd should be handled carefully, and the editors should make a first choice. The editor's first choice is to accept unethical or illegal behavior. In that case, all the proof should be gathered and discussed with a group of editorial board members who have been put together to deal with the problem. In the case of minor infractions, the editor should keep the group small and give the author a chance to reply. If the accused did something wrong, their bosses may need to be told about the case. The employee's role should be chosen after a quick study and talks with experts and members of the editing board. When there is a breach of ethics or misconduct, the author or reviewer may be informed or educated if they seem to have misunderstood or misapplied the rules, or they may get a more strongly worded letter about the breach and a warning about how they should act in the future. Let's say the case is serious, and the people on the editing board decide to do so. In that case, an official warning or a letter about the wrongdoing could be released. An official message can be sent through the concerned or the funding agency if necessary. And if the editorial board members can't fix the violation or transgression and need more research, the patient and the result could be sent to a professional group or a higher authority for more research and action. 

To the Peer Reviewers

           Reviewers should look at the files with an open mind and quickly so they can help make decisions and improve the quality of the paper that gets published. They should keep private any information given to them by the editor or the author, and they shouldn't save or copy the text. The reviewers are in charge of telling the editor about any content that has been released or submitted that is very close to the content under review. They should be aware of any possible conflicts of interest between the reviewer and the author, such as financial, institutional, joint, or other ties, and let the editor know about them. If necessary, they should also remove their services from that document. 

To the Authors

           Authors are expected to keep any relevant information about their filed work and give it to anyone who asks for it somewhat. They should keep the information about their piece in a good place so that it can be used by others, like their boss, the group that gave them the money, and anyone else interested in the information, if they are allowed to. The writers must swear under oath that their paper has not been looked at or accepted for release elsewhere. Content published or submitted before must be given thanks where it is due. Also, if a paper is presented, that is very similar to another work. The writer must provide the editor with a copy of the article. Authors are expected to swear that their submitted piece has no copied parts and to give credit for any claims that came from somewhere else. Before using something from another source, the author must get permission to do so. Human or animal subjects in research should follow all relevant national, local, and institutional laws and requirements, such as the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki, the National Institutes of Health's policy on the use of laboratory animals, and the European Union's Directive on the use of animals. Authors should also make sure they have all the necessary approvals. Before people are used to writing, they should give their permission. The author must tell the reviewers immediately if a released work has a big mistake. They will work with the editor and writer to make an erratum, amendment, corrigendum notice, or withdrawal of the publishing if they think it is essential.

We offer other services like proof-reading and English language correction, that can be requested by the author on payment. 

PUBLICATION DETAILS

Name:  Journal of Ongoing Educational Research
ISSN 3062-0201, National Centre for Turkey
Period: Monthly

Publication Guidelines:  COPE Guidelines

PUBLISHER DETAILS

SciMatic Inc.
Adnan Menderes Technocity
Office No: 29b, Aydın Adnan Menderes University Main Campus
Efeler-09100, Aydin, Turkey

For the aspiring team: If you want to be part of the editorial board or peer reviewer, you can submit your application with your CV with the title of the position you are applying for. Send it to JOERpub@gmail.com  for faster response. Thank you!