Comparison of the Impact of Different Administration Routes on the Efficacy of a Thermoresistant Newcastle Disease Vaccine in Chickens.

Comparison of the Impact of Different Administration Routes on the Efficacy of a Thermoresistant Newcastle Disease Vaccine in Chickens.

Hassanzadeh, Mohammad;Abdoshah, Mohammad;Yousefi, Ali Reza;Masoudi, Shahin;
viral immunology 2020
254
hassanzadeh2020comparisonviral

Abstract

Route of vaccine administration has a great impact on immunization and protection outcomes in chickens. This study was conducted to compare the effect of different administration routes on the efficacy of a thermoresistant Newcastle disease (ND) vaccine (ND.TR.IR) in chickens. A total of 100 one-day-old specific pathogen-free chicks were divided into five groups ( = 20 chicks per group) and vaccinated through different routes at 10 and 20 days of age. Treatments included no vaccination (control [C]), 1 dose inoculation through eye drop (ED), 1 dose inoculation through drinking water (DW), 1 dose inoculation through feed (FV), and 10 doses inoculation through feed (FV). At 20 and 34 days of age, antibody titers were measured against ND virus (NDV) in all the chickens by hemagglutination inhibition (HI) test. Chicks immunized with ND.TR.IR vaccine through different routes of administration also were intramuscularly challenged with a local virulent NDV (vNDV) (Ck/ir/Beh/2011) 14 days after booster vaccination (at 34 days of age). Our results showed that in comparison with the FVs groups, the immunized chicks through ED induced a higher HI antibody titers at 20 days of age ( < 0.05). Meanwhile, vaccination through ED induced higher HI antibody titers at day 34 of age compared with all other groups ( > 0.05). The percentages of the protective HI antibody titers (≥log) detected in ED and DW groups at 20 days of age were higher than those detected in the FV group ( < 0.05). However, routes of vaccination had no significant effect on the rate of protective titers at day 34 of age (100%, 90%, 75%, and 85% for ED, DW, FV, and FV, respectively). The percentage of post-NDV challenge survived chickens was not affected by the route of vaccination ( > 0.05), but immunization of chicks with ND.TR.IR in FV group provided relatively poorer protection when compared with the other groups (90% vs. 100%, respectively). Altogether, immunization of chicks with ND.TR.IR vaccine through different routes of administration induced protective NDV antibody HI titers, and provided protection against vNDV. However, when the vaccine was administrated through feed, a higher dose of vaccine is recommended.

Citation

ID: 88326
Ref Key: hassanzadeh2020comparisonviral
Use this key to autocite in SciMatic or Thesis Manager

References

Blockchain Verification

Account:
NFT Contract Address:
0x95644003c57E6F55A65596E3D9Eac6813e3566dA
Article ID:
88326
Unique Identifier:
10.1089/vim.2019.0125
Network:
Scimatic Chain (ID: 481)
Loading...
Blockchain Readiness Checklist
Authors
Abstract
Journal Name
Year
Title
5/5
Creates 1,000,000 NFT tokens for this article
Token Features:
  • ERC-1155 Standard NFT
  • 1 Million Supply per Article
  • Transferable via MetaMask
  • Permanent Blockchain Record
Blockchain QR Code
Scan with Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet

Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet