Context in Generalized Conversational Implicatures: The Case of Some.
Current Language EN
English English Türkçe Türkçe Español Español Português Português Pусский Pусский Filipino Filipino Tiếng Việt Tiếng Việt हिन्दी हिन्दी العربية العربية বাংলা বাংলা Deutsch Deutsch 中文 中文

Context in Generalized Conversational Implicatures: The Case of Some.

Dupuy, Ludivine E;Van der Henst, Jean-Baptiste;Cheylus, Anne;Reboul, Anne C;
Frontiers in psychology 2016 Vol. 7 pp. 381
194
dupuy2016contextfrontiers

Abstract

There is now general agreement about the optionality of scalar implicatures: the pragmatic interpretation will be accessed depending on the context relative to which the utterance is interpreted. The question, then, is what makes a context upper- (vs. lower-) bounding. Neo-Gricean accounts should predict that contexts including factual information will enhance the rate of pragmatic interpretations. Post-Gricean accounts should predict that contexts including psychological attributions will enhance the rate of pragmatic interpretations. We tested two factors using the quantifier scale : (1) the existence of factual information that facilitates the computation of pragmatic interpretations in the context (here, the cardinality of the domain of quantification) and (2) the fact that the context makes the difference between the semantic and the pragmatic interpretations of the target sentence relevant, involving psychological attributions to the speaker (here a question using all). We did three experiments, all of which suggest that while cardinality information may be necessary to the computation of the pragmatic interpretation, it plays a minor role in triggering it; highlighting the contrast between the pragmatic and the semantic interpretations, while it is not necessary to the computation of the pragmatic interpretation, strongly mandates a pragmatic interpretation. These results favor Sperber and Wilson's (1995) post-Gricean account over Chierchia's (2013) neo-Gricean account. Overall, this suggests that highlighting the relevance of the pragmatic vs. semantic interpretations of the target sentence makes a context upper-bounding. Additionally, the results give a small advantage to the post-Gricean account.

Keywords

Relevance scalar implicature cardinality of domain of quantification domain of quantification lower-bounding context upper-bounding context

Access

DOI:
10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00381

Citation

ID: 62895
Ref Key: dupuy2016contextfrontiers
Use this key to autocite in SciMatic or Thesis Manager

References

References

No Bibliography

Blockchain Verification

Account:
NFT Contract Address:
0x95644003c57E6F55A65596E3D9Eac6813e3566dA
Article ID:
62895
Unique Identifier:
10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00381
Network:
Scimatic Chain (ID: 481)
Blockchain Readiness Checklist
Authors
Abstract
Journal Name
Year
Title
5/5
Creates 1,000,000 NFT tokens for this article
Token Features:
  • ERC-1155 Standard NFT
  • 1 Million Supply per Article
  • Transferable via MetaMask
  • Permanent Blockchain Record
Blockchain QR Code
Scan with Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet
Gas fees required in SCI Coins
Buy SCI

Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet

Google Play
App Store