Clinical management options for dysphagia include the use of thickeners to increase the consistency of liquids. Health professionals may not be aware of the nutrition value of these products, since there are no such recommendation in clinical guidelines. Our aim was to estimate the added nutrition value of the 2 types of commercial thickeners (starch and xanthan gum) to daily nutrition intake and compare their nutrition value for nectar, honey, and pudding consistencies. Additionally, we compared the nutrition value of both thickeners with a high-energy powder, since they share the same main ingredients.We collected recommended dosages for obtaining the 3 different consistencies and nutrition content from the technical food labels. Daily intake of fluids was estimated from the Portuguese National Food, Nutrition and Physical Activity Survey. Total daily amount of thickener needed was estimated, as well as their correspondent nutrition contributions.Estimated daily fluid intake was 2439 mL. Starch thickeners provide significantly more energy at all consistencies than xanthan gum provides (423-846 kcal, P < 0.05, and 103-308 kcal, P < 0.05, respectively). Significantly more fiber is provided by xanthan gum thickeners (9 g in nectar and 27 g in pudding consistencies, P < 0.05). Median energy and carbohydrate values per 100 g of high-energy powder modules and starch thickeners are similar.The nutrition value of thickeners should be routinely considered in the nutrition assessment and planning of patients with dysphagia for liquids, since they contribute significantly with energy, carbohydrate, and fiber.