This is the third and final part of our update on the latest advances in cardiac valvular replacement. Part 1 was dedicated to cardiac valvular replacement, and Part 2 focused on transcatheter cardiac valvular treatment. This part concerns annuloplasty prostheses for valvular reconstructive surgery. The number of patients undergoing surgical heart valve repair has been increasing, particularly in high-volume centers. Annuloplasty is now considered the gold standard in mitral valve regurgitation repair secondary to degenerative, ischemic and idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy disease. The techniques of mitral valve reconstruction have been well established, but controversies remain regarding the type of annuloplasty ring to be used. The available annuloplasty rings include rigid, flexible, complete, partial, and semi-rigid/flexible. The choice of annuloplasty ring has been the focus of extensive investigation and debate, but to date it still largely remains a matter of "surgeon's preference" rather than an evidence-based selection. Functional tricuspid regurgitation was traditionally treated by the classic De Vega annuloplasty, but has since evolved after the development of prosthetic tricuspid annuloplasty. Head-to-head comparisons have demonstrated superior long-term outcomes with device-based annuloplasty compared to suture-based surgery, but the type of ring to be used (flexible versus rigid) has recently been questioned, without reaching definitive conclusions. In contrast to mitral and tricuspid valve repair, aortic repair is more difficult with respect to specific valve features. Annuloplasty is considered to play a key role in controlling aortic regurgitation and preventing recurrence after valve repair. Various modifications of annuloplasty have been advocated (internal/external, with/without ring (suture), rigid/flexible ring). but none of them has become a de facto standard. This paper describes the various rings that are available to help orient surgeons and to serve as a reference for students.