Comparison of forward and backward gait characteristics between those with and without a history of breast cancer.

Comparison of forward and backward gait characteristics between those with and without a history of breast cancer.

Vallabhajosula, Srikant;Deaterly, Caroline D;Madzima, Takudzwa A;
gait & posture 2019 Vol. 74 pp. 162-168
266
vallabhajosula2019comparisongait

Abstract

Decreased muscular strength and poorer postural stability impact the physical function of breast cancer survivors (BCS) and increases their risk of falls. Gait assessment, particularly in the backward direction, is often used as an indicator of fall risk in several populations. However this information is unknown in BCS.What are the differences in forward, backward, and accelerated forward walking in BCS in comparison to individuals without a prior cancer diagnosis?17 postmenopausal BCS (mean age: 58.5 (8.5) years) and 17 age-matched women without a prior cancer diagnosis (mean age: 59.11 (5.55) years) completed 5 trials each of forward, backward, and fast forward walking conditions. Absolute (Means) and variability (Coefficient of variation) estimates were obtained for spatio-temporal gait parameters. Lower body, upper body and handgrip strengths were measured.For absolute estimates of gait, significant group main effects indicated that BCS had 7% shorter step length (P = 0.019) and 8% slower gait speed (P = 0.048). For variability estimates of gait, there was a significant interaction for stance time (P = 0.035). BCS had greater stance time variability during forward and fast forward conditions, but lesser variability during backward condition. Averaged across all the conditions, BCS had 38% greater step length variability (P = 0.043), 50% greater gait speed variability (P = 0.028), and 28.5% greater single support time variability (P = 0.004). Averaged across both the groups, all the variables except for swing time variability were significantly different among the conditions (all P< = 0.013). BCS also had significantly reduced upper body strength (P = 0.036).Slower and shorter steps while walking both forwards and backwards could be indicative of a more cautious gait strategy by BCS. Also, BCS possibly focused on controlling spatial parameters during forward walking but temporal parameters while backward walking. Whether these alterations are related to an increased fall risk within BCS needs to be determined.

Citation

ID: 45571
Ref Key: vallabhajosula2019comparisongait
Use this key to autocite in SciMatic or Thesis Manager

References

Blockchain Verification

Account:
NFT Contract Address:
0x95644003c57E6F55A65596E3D9Eac6813e3566dA
Article ID:
45571
Unique Identifier:
S0966-6362(19)30270-X
Network:
Scimatic Chain (ID: 481)
Loading...
Blockchain Readiness Checklist
Authors
Abstract
Journal Name
Year
Title
5/5
Creates 1,000,000 NFT tokens for this article
Token Features:
  • ERC-1155 Standard NFT
  • 1 Million Supply per Article
  • Transferable via MetaMask
  • Permanent Blockchain Record
Blockchain QR Code
Scan with Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet

Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet