DEVELOPING NATIONAL CONSENSUS FOR CME ACCREDITATION SYSTEM

DEVELOPING NATIONAL CONSENSUS FOR CME ACCREDITATION SYSTEM

Aslam, Muhammad;Rahman, Mati Ur;Iqbal, Mobeen;
khyber medical university journal 2012 Vol. 4 pp. 85-86
313
aslam2012developingkhyber

Abstract

The purpose of accreditation in Continuing MedicalEducation [CME] is to improve medical education tochanging conditions in the health care delivery systemand to prepare doctors for the needs and expectationsof the society. The imminent outcome of CME is to “buildoneness” in the incorporation of essentials of globalguidelines in the national standards and to work out theaccreditation pathways and procedure.It may be borne in mind that medical education isnot an abrupt phenomenon. It is a continuum from premedicalstudies to undergraduate education and then topostgraduate studies and thereafter to CME or continuousprofessional development [CPD]. It doesn’t work inisolation.Accreditation of CME is a risk reduction strategy.The value of accreditation is that it provides a process ofimprovement and development of the system. Standardsand indicators must be identified, but achieving consensuson standards is the greatest challenge. Accreditationis concerned primarily with standards, whereas,quality assurance pertains to “fitness for purpose”. Thus,in order to achieve an optimal outcome, both accreditationand quality assurance are essential.The question is why do we need National CME accreditationprogramme? The answer is simple, becauseit’s non-existing in the country, [though there are someguidelines available for undergraduate and postgraduatemedical curriculum]. In addition, CME is outcomeoriented,socially accountable, quality assurer and unbiased[especially from industry influence]. There are certainrequirements to invent an accreditation system. Itshould be based on standards and must be independent,transparent, non-profit making and accountable.Furthermore, it should be acceptable to all major stakeholders,and efficiently administered. CME accreditationsystem may not be sustainable if it doesn’t possess adequatehuman, material and financial resources andabove all, national legitimacy. Accreditation system possessessome desirable qualities like it is self-limited, voluntary[with incentive], acceptable, credible, relevant,valid and reliable. It is important that it should be feasiblefor given socioeconomic, political and cultural situations.

Citation

ID: 39173
Ref Key: aslam2012developingkhyber
Use this key to autocite in SciMatic or Thesis Manager

References

Blockchain Verification

Account:
NFT Contract Address:
0x95644003c57E6F55A65596E3D9Eac6813e3566dA
Article ID:
39173
Unique Identifier:
Network:
Scimatic Chain (ID: 481)
Loading...
Blockchain Readiness Checklist
Authors
Abstract
Journal Name
Year
Title
5/5
Creates 1,000,000 NFT tokens for this article
Token Features:
  • ERC-1155 Standard NFT
  • 1 Million Supply per Article
  • Transferable via MetaMask
  • Permanent Blockchain Record
Blockchain QR Code
Scan with Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet

Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet