A Comparative Analysis of Bladder Pattern of Patients that Underwent In Utero Versus Postnatal Myelomeningocele Repair.

A Comparative Analysis of Bladder Pattern of Patients that Underwent In Utero Versus Postnatal Myelomeningocele Repair.

Gomes Parizi, João Luiz;Leal da Cruz, Marcela;Andrade, Maria Cristina;Garrone, Gilmar;Ottoni, Sérgio Leite;Cavalheiro, Sérgio;Moron, Antonio;Macedo, Antonio;
the journal of urology 2019 pp. 101097JU0000000000000521
230
gomes-parizi2019athe

Abstract

In utero myelomeningocele (MMC) closure is a valid alternative to postnatal repair with unclear benefits to bladder function. We compared the bladder status in patients that underwent fetal MMC surgery and postnatal repair.We retrospectively reviewed our database: Group 1 consisted of in utero surgery and group 2 consisted of postnatal repair. Group 3 was a subgroup of 2, including patients presenting initially with age below 12 months. We recorded medical history, radiological investigation renal ultrasonography, voiding cystourethrography (VCUG), urodynamic evaluation (UE) and clinical outcome of the bladder pattern after treatment.We identified 88 patients in Group 1, 86 in Group 2, and 38 patients in Group 3. The incidence of UTI was higher in the postnatal period (45% versus 20%). Hydronephrosis occurred in 20.7%, 22.6%, and 28.9% in Groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. VUR was diagnosed in 15% in all groups. Urodynamic data showed a higher prevalence of detrusor overactivity in Group 1, no difference in others urodynamic parameters. The high-risk bladder pattern at initial evaluation occurred in 56%, 50%, and 46% of groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively. There was a trend to decrease the percentages of the high risk bladder pattern and to increase the normal pattern after the treatment in all groups.In utero repair did not improve urological parameters when compared to patients operated in the postnatal period.

Citation

ID: 37202
Ref Key: gomes-parizi2019athe
Use this key to autocite in SciMatic or Thesis Manager

References

Blockchain Verification

Account:
NFT Contract Address:
0x95644003c57E6F55A65596E3D9Eac6813e3566dA
Article ID:
37202
Unique Identifier:
10.1097/JU.0000000000000521
Network:
Scimatic Chain (ID: 481)
Loading...
Blockchain Readiness Checklist
Authors
Abstract
Journal Name
Year
Title
5/5
Creates 1,000,000 NFT tokens for this article
Token Features:
  • ERC-1155 Standard NFT
  • 1 Million Supply per Article
  • Transferable via MetaMask
  • Permanent Blockchain Record
Blockchain QR Code
Scan with Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet

Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet