Abstract
The affect misattribution procedure (
AMP
) is widely used to measure sensitive attitudes towards classes of stimuli, by estimating the effect that affectively charged prime images have on subsequent judgements of neutral target images. We test its resistance to efforts to conceal one's attitudes, by replicating the standard
AMP
design while offering small incentives to conceal attitudes towards the prime images. We find that although the average
AMP
effect remains positive, it decreases significantly in magnitude. Moreover, this reduction in the mean
AMP
effect under incentives masks large heterogeneity: one subset of individuals continues to experience the ‘full’
AMP
effect, while another reduces their effect to approximately zero. The
AMP
thus appears to be resistant to efforts to conceal one's attitudes for some individuals but is highly controllable for others. We further find that those individuals with high self‐reported effort to avoid the influence of the prime are more often able to eliminate their
AMP
effect. We conclude by discussing possible mechanisms.
Citation
ID:
284124
Ref Key:
j.2018stresstesting