Military Combat Eye Protection uptake of UK service personnel on Operation TORAL in Afghanistan
Current Language EN
English English Türkçe Türkçe Español Español Português Português Pусский Pусский Filipino Filipino Tiếng Việt Tiếng Việt हिन्दी हिन्दी العربية العربية বাংলা বাংলা Deutsch Deutsch 中文 中文

Military Combat Eye Protection uptake of UK service personnel on Operation TORAL in Afghanistan

Breeze, John; Lewis, E; Bowley, D; Coates, R; Abbott, C; Evans, P; Blanch, R; Russell, J
bmj military health 2025 pp. military-2025-002982
2
john2025military

Abstract

Introduction Military Combat Eye Protection (CEP) is a form of personal protective equipment designed to protect the eyes and surrounding structures. A review of 67 586 US and UK personnel wounded during Iraq and Afghanistan demonstrated that eye injuries were present in 8% of survivors or those who died of wounds. CEP was first introduced to UK military personnel in Iraq during 2006 and has been shown to reduce both the incidence and severity of eye injury, with the current CEP issued as part of the VIRTUS body armour and load carriage system. Method To assess user perception and experience of issued CEP by UK service personnel, a voluntary survey was returned by 200 UK personnel deployed on Operation TORAL, the UK contribution to the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)’s Resolute Support Mission in Afghanistan post Op HERRICK, from 2014. In total, 10 questions were asked about CEP, including two that allowed users to offer ‘free-text’ comments. Results 193 out of 200 (97%) responded that they regularly wore the issued low-impact spectacles, while 54 out of 198 (27%) responded that they regularly changed their lenses. Goggles were worn by only 25 out of 200 (13%), with 64 out of 200 (32%) stating they perceived that there was no requirement for their use. Conclusions Excellent wearer uptake of low-impact spectacles was found, likely reflecting mandatory use in conjunction with a well-established predeployment educational programme. The poor uptake of medium-impact goggles reflected that either users perceived that there was no requirement to wear them or did not believe they had been issued them. Further research is recommended to identify the optimal colour of lens that should be used. If multiple lens colours are required, lenses should either be easier to change or multiple sets should be issued, along with appropriate training provided for when each lens should be used.

Access

DOI:
10.1136/military-2025-002982
URL:
https://doi.org/10.1136/military-2025-002982

Citation

ID: 283786
Ref Key: john2025military
Use this key to autocite in SciMatic or Thesis Manager

References

References

No Bibliography

Blockchain Verification

Account:
NFT Contract Address:
0x95644003c57E6F55A65596E3D9Eac6813e3566dA
Article ID:
283786
Unique Identifier:
10.1136/military-2025-002982
Network:
Scimatic Chain (ID: 481)
Blockchain Readiness Checklist
Authors
Abstract
Journal Name
Year
Title
5/5
Creates 1,000,000 NFT tokens for this article
Token Features:
  • ERC-1155 Standard NFT
  • 1 Million Supply per Article
  • Transferable via MetaMask
  • Permanent Blockchain Record
Blockchain QR Code
Scan with Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet
Gas fees required in SCI Coins
Buy SCI

Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet

Google Play
App Store