Cities are some of the most intricate and advanced creations of humanity. Most objects in cities are perfectly synchronised to coordinate activities like jobs, education, transportation, entertainment or waste management. Although each city has its characteristics, some commonalities can be observed across most cities, like issues related to noise, pollution, segregation and others. Further, some of these issues might be accentuated in larger or smaller cities. For example, with more people, a city might experience more competition for space so rents would be higher. The urban scaling theory gives a framework to analyse cities in the context of their size. New data for analysing urban scaling theory allow an understanding of how urban metrics change with their population size, whether they apply across most regions or if patterns correspond only to some country or region. Yet, reducing a city and all its complexity into a single indicator might simplify urban areas to an extent where their disparities and variations are overlooked. Often, the differences between the living conditions in different parts of the same city are bigger than the degree of variation observed between cities. For example, in terms of rent or crime, within-city variations might be more significant than between cities. Here, we review some urban scaling principles and explore ways to analyse variations within the same city.