Diagnostic challenges, management and outcomes of midline low-grade gliomas - Journal of Neuro-Oncology

Diagnostic challenges, management and outcomes of midline low-grade gliomas - Journal of Neuro-Oncology

Mueez Waqar;Shahid Hanif;Nitika Rathi;Kumar Das;Rasheed Zakaria;Andrew R. Brodbelt;Carol Walker;Michael D. Jenkinson;Mueez Waqar;Shahid Hanif;Nitika Rathi;Kumar Das;Rasheed Zakaria;Andrew R. Brodbelt;Carol Walker;Michael D. Jenkinson;
journal of neuro-oncology 2014 Vol. 120 pp. 389-398
153
waqar2014journaldiagnostic

Abstract

Introduction Low-grade gliomas (LGGs) are slow-growing and diffusely infiltrating tumours constituting 25–30 % of adult gliomas. Rarely, these tumours may arise in the cerebral midline, including the thalamus, hypothalamus, tectum and brainstem. Here we present a contemporary experience with midline LGGs. Methods Midline LGGs were identified from a retrospective database of adult patients who received a histological diagnosis of WHO grade II glioma between 2006 and 2012 at a single institution. Location, radiological data and clinical outcomes were collected. IDH1 status was assessed by immunohistochemistry. Results Eighteen patients with midline LGGs were identified, with a median age of 45. Most received biopsy upon diagnosis, though asymptomatic patients with tectal tumours underwent active surveillance. Oligodendroglial tumours were much less common than in a comparable group of lobar tumours (6 vs. 38 %, Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.007). Only one tumour was immunopositive for IDH1 (1/17). Radiological diagnosis correlated with histology in only 71 % of patients. Median survival of midline LGGs was 48 months (3–90 months) and radiological features such as contrast enhancement, size and radiological diagnosis did not predict survival in this cohort. Median overall survival of midline LGGs was less than lobar LGGs (log-rank, p = 0.006), though differences became insignificant when considering only biopsied astrocytomas in both locations (log-rank, p = 0.491). Conclusions Diagnosis of midline LGGs is complicated by both limitations of biopsy and imaging. Midline tumours have a poorer prognosis compared to lobar equivalents and survival differences are probably due to the absence of significant surgical intervention in midline locations.

Citation

ID: 267512
Ref Key: waqar2014journaldiagnostic
Use this key to autocite in SciMatic or Thesis Manager

References

Blockchain Verification

Account:
NFT Contract Address:
0x95644003c57E6F55A65596E3D9Eac6813e3566dA
Article ID:
267512
Unique Identifier:
doi:10.1007/s11060-014-1563-6
Network:
Scimatic Chain (ID: 481)
Loading...
Blockchain Readiness Checklist
Authors
Abstract
Journal Name
Year
Title
5/5
Creates 1,000,000 NFT tokens for this article
Token Features:
  • ERC-1155 Standard NFT
  • 1 Million Supply per Article
  • Transferable via MetaMask
  • Permanent Blockchain Record
Blockchain QR Code
Scan with Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet

Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet