comparison of different dna staining methods in the comet assay

comparison of different dna staining methods in the comet assay

;Tamara Bakuradze
chemical record (new york, ny) 2015 Vol. 6 pp. -
164
bakuradze2015frontierscomparison

Abstract

Single-cell gel electrophoresis (SCGE, comet assay) is a sensitive technique for measuring DNA damage at the level of an individual cell (Collins, A.R. 2013). A fluorescent dye commonly used for visualisation of DNA damage is the intercalating agent ethidium bromide. However, ethidium bromide is thought to act as a mutagen and is categorized as carcinogen. The new generation of fluorescent DNA staining agents such as SYBR Green or GelRed are developed to replace highly toxic ethidium bromide. These substances are marketed as less toxic and more sensitive alternatives to ethidium bromide. The aim of our research was to investigate the sensitivity of three different fluorescent dyes, ethidium bromide, SYBR Green I, and GelRed, as well as comparing the obtained results with each other. DNA damage induced by photosensitizer riboflavin (50 µmol/L) in the presence of visible light (Epe et al., 1993) was determined in HT-29 colon carcinoma cells without/ with formamidopyrimidine DNA glycosylase (FPG) treatment. Results show that staining of cells with SYBR Green I and GelRed gave similar tail intensities (TI%) as ethidium bromide. Tail intensities of riboflavin-induced DNA damage without/with FPG treatment were 2.19 / 4.74 TI% for ethidium bromide, 2.17 / 4.82 TI% for SYBR Green I, and 2.12 / 5.05 TI% for GelRed. Similar results were observed for negative control (0.1% DMSO). Taken together, our research demonstrates that all three investigated fluorescent DNA staining agents provide comparable results in HT-29 cells and SYBR Green I as well as GelRed are suitable alternatives to ethidium bromide. To confirm our results a large number of samples should be tested in future.

Citation

ID: 246682
Ref Key: bakuradze2015frontierscomparison
Use this key to autocite in SciMatic or Thesis Manager

References

Blockchain Verification

Account:
NFT Contract Address:
0x95644003c57E6F55A65596E3D9Eac6813e3566dA
Article ID:
246682
Unique Identifier:
10.3389/conf.fgene.2015.01.00007
Network:
Scimatic Chain (ID: 481)
Loading...
Blockchain Readiness Checklist
Authors
Abstract
Journal Name
Year
Title
5/5
Creates 1,000,000 NFT tokens for this article
Token Features:
  • ERC-1155 Standard NFT
  • 1 Million Supply per Article
  • Transferable via MetaMask
  • Permanent Blockchain Record
Blockchain QR Code
Scan with Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet

Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet