Abstract
The thermal properties of the surface and subsurface layers of planets and
planetary objects yield important information that allows us to better
understand the thermal evolution of the body itself and its interactions with
the environment. Various planetary bodies of our Solar System are covered by
so-called regolith, a granular and porous material. On such planetary bodies
the dominant heat transfer mechanism is heat conduction via IR radiation and
contact points between particles. In this case the energy balance is mainly
controlled by the effective thermal conductivity of the top surface layers,
which can be directly measured by thermal conductivity probes. A
traditionally used method for measuring the thermal conductivity of solid
materials is the needle-probe method. Such probes consist of thin steel
needles with an embedded heating wire and temperature sensors. For the
evaluation of the thermal conductivity of a specific material the temperature
change with time is determined by heating a resistance wire with a
well-defined electrical current flowing through it and simultaneously
measuring the temperature increase inside the probe over a certain time. For
thin needle probes with a large length-to-diameter ratio it is mathematically
easy to derive the thermal conductivity, while this is not so straightforward
for more rugged probes with a larger diameter and thus a smaller
length-to-diameter ratio. Due to the geometry of the standard thin needle
probes they are mechanically weak and subject to bending when driven into a
soil. Therefore, using them for planetary missions can be problematic.
In this paper the thermal conductivity values determined by measurements with
two non-ideal, ruggedized thermal conductivity sensors, which only differ in
length, are compared to each other. Since the theory describing the
temperature response of non-ideal sensors is highly complicated, those
sensors were calibrated with an ideal reference sensor in various solid and
granular materials. The calibration procedure and the results are described
in this work.
Citation
ID:
238107
Ref Key:
tiefenbacher2016geoscientificinfluence