congenital anomalies associated with syndromic and non-syndromic cleft lip and palate

congenital anomalies associated with syndromic and non-syndromic cleft lip and palate

;A.I. Hadadi;D. Al Wohaibi;N. Almtrok;N. Aljahdali;O. AlMeshal;M. Badri
revista brasileira de farmacognosia 2017 Vol. 14 pp. 5-15
346
hadadi2017jprascongenital

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate our institution’s experience with cleft lip and palate patients and the associated syndromes and congenital anomalies. Design: Retrospective cross-sectional hospital-based study. Setting: King Abdul-Aziz Medical City, a major tertiary care center in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Patients, participants: The study included all orofacial cleft (OC) cases treated at our institution between January 2008 and December 2014. Main outcome measures: All subtypes of OC classifications with gender distribution, frequency of associated congenital anomalies, syndromes, and the sequelae of OC including otitis media and aspiration pneumonia. Results: The study included 196 patients. All OC cases were typical. Median (interquartile range) age was 9 (3–24) months, and 109/196 (56%) were male. Syndromic OC accounted for 38/196 (19%). The most common OC subtype was cleft palate (CP) in 78/196 (40%), followed by cleft-lip and palate in 67/196 (34%), and cleft-lip in 51/196 (26%). Congenital anomalies were diagnosed in 41/196 (21%) patients with congenital heart anomaly 24/41(58.5%), which was the commonest. Robin sequence was the most commonly associated clinical entity, seen in 25/196 (13%). Other syndromes identified included popliteal pterygium, Stickler, Apert, Dandy-Walker, Blepharo-cheilo-dontic, and Turner syndromes. OC subtypes differed significantly by congenital anomalies (χ2, p < 0.0001) and syndromes (χ2 p < 0.0001). Otitis media was most common in the CP subtype, seen in 55/196 (54%). Conclusions: Patients with OC are at increased risk of congenital malformations and syndromes. Routine screening for congenital heart anomalies should be considered and genetic counseling might be warranted in familial cases.

Citation

ID: 223224
Ref Key: hadadi2017jprascongenital
Use this key to autocite in SciMatic or Thesis Manager

References

Blockchain Verification

Account:
NFT Contract Address:
0x95644003c57E6F55A65596E3D9Eac6813e3566dA
Article ID:
223224
Unique Identifier:
10.1016/j.jpra.2017.06.001
Network:
Scimatic Chain (ID: 481)
Loading...
Blockchain Readiness Checklist
Authors
Abstract
Journal Name
Year
Title
5/5
Creates 1,000,000 NFT tokens for this article
Token Features:
  • ERC-1155 Standard NFT
  • 1 Million Supply per Article
  • Transferable via MetaMask
  • Permanent Blockchain Record
Blockchain QR Code
Scan with Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet

Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet