Prior studies have defined minimum mesiodistal space (MS) and faciolingual alveolar width (FAW) requirements for dental implant sites, and failure to observe these constraints may adversely impact peri-implant health and esthetics. However, to the authors' knowledge, no previous reports have established frequencies at which anterior tooth positions present favorable MS and FAW for implant accommodation.A single examiner analyzed 205 cone-beam computed tomographic images, recording MS and FAW available for implant placement at anterior tooth positions. The examiner compared measurements with standardized implant diameters to assess anticipated implant-to-tooth distances and peri-implant bone thicknesses.In the esthetic zone, lateral incisor sites most frequently failed to present favorable MS. At maxillary lateral incisor positions, 22% (left) and 27% (right) of sites offered less than 2 millimeters between the proposed implant platform and the adjacent teeth. In mandibular incisor positions, implant-to-tooth distance was less than 2 mm at 79% through 97% of sites and less than 1.5 mm at 35% through 76% of sites. Over one-half of maxillary incisor sites and 78% through 95% of mandibular incisor sites exhibited FAW of less than 4 mm beyond implant diameter.In the population evaluated, mandibular incisor positions frequently presented unfavorable MS to accommodate conventional narrow-diameter implants. In addition, considerable proportions of mandibular incisor and maxillary lateral incisor sites may be at risk of developing unfavorable peri-implant bone thickness when conventional narrow-diameter implants are used.Practitioners should consider small-diameter implants and nonimplant tooth replacement methods for many patients missing single mandibular incisors or maxillary lateral incisors.