the provision and impact of online patient access to their electronic health records (ehr) and transactional services on the quality and safety of health care: systematic review protocol

the provision and impact of online patient access to their electronic health records (ehr) and transactional services on the quality and safety of health care: systematic review protocol

;Freda Mold;Beverley Ellis;Simon de Lusignan;Aziz Sheikh;Jeremy C Wyatt;Mary Cavill;Georgios Michalakidis;Fiona Barker;Azeem Majeed;Tom Quinn;Phil Koczan;Theo Avanitis;Toto Anne Gronlund;Christina Franco;Mary McCarthy;Zoe Renton;Umesh Chauhan;Hannah Blakey;Neha Kataria;Simon Jones;Imran Rafi
materials & design 2013 Vol. 20 pp. 271-282
500
mold2013journalthe

Abstract

Background Innovators have piloted improvements in communication, changed patterns of practice and patient empowerment from online access to electronic health records (EHR). International studies of online services, such as prescription ordering, online appointment booking and secure communications with primary care, show good uptake of email consultations, accessing test results and booking appointments; when technologies and business process are in place. Online access and transactional services are due to be rolled out across England by 2015; this review seeks to explore the impact of online access to health records and other online services on the quality and safety of primary health care.

Objective To assess the factors that may affect the provision of online patient access to their EHR and transactional services, and the impact of such access on the quality and safety of health care.

Method Two reviewers independently searched 11 international databases during the period 1999–2012. A range of papers including descriptive studies using qualitative or quantitative methods, hypothesis-testing studies and systematic reviews were included. A detailed eligibility criterion will be used to shape study inclusion .A team of experts will review these papers for eligibility, extract data using a customised extraction form and use the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) instrument to determine the quality of the evidence and the strengths of any recommendation. Data will then be descriptively summarised and thematically synthesised. Where feasible, we will perform a quantitative meta-analysis.

Prospero (International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews) registration number: crd42012003091.

Citation

ID: 131178
Ref Key: mold2013journalthe
Use this key to autocite in SciMatic or Thesis Manager

References

Blockchain Verification

Account:
NFT Contract Address:
0x95644003c57E6F55A65596E3D9Eac6813e3566dA
Article ID:
131178
Unique Identifier:
10.14236/jhi.v20i4.17
Network:
Scimatic Chain (ID: 481)
Loading...
Blockchain Readiness Checklist
Authors
Abstract
Journal Name
Year
Title
5/5
Creates 1,000,000 NFT tokens for this article
Token Features:
  • ERC-1155 Standard NFT
  • 1 Million Supply per Article
  • Transferable via MetaMask
  • Permanent Blockchain Record
Blockchain QR Code
Scan with Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet

Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet