Guidelines for Journal reviewing
Abstract
All peer‐reviewed journals are absolutely dependent on the quality of the reviews of submitted manuscripts by volunteer reviewers. While editors make an initial assessment of the relevance to readers of a manuscript as well as ensure general writing standards are met, it is the independent reviewers who give detailed feedback about the content, methodology, conclusions and significance to health promotion. Reviewers also give advice to the editors on whether a manuscript should be accepted for publication, revised, or rejected (in their view). Editors then make a decision about the fate of a manuscript and this decision is often, but not always, consistent with the recommendation of reviewers.
Keywords
Access
Citation
ID:
110602
References
Blockchain Verification
Account:
NFT Contract Address:
0x95644003c57E6F55A65596E3D9Eac6813e3566dA
Article ID:
110602
Unique Identifier:
10.1071/he03079b
Network:
Scimatic Chain (ID: 481)
Loading...
Blockchain Readiness Checklist
Authors
Abstract
Journal Name
Year
Title
Creates 1,000,000 NFT tokens for this article
Token Features:
- ERC-1155 Standard NFT
- 1 Million Supply per Article
- Transferable via MetaMask
- Permanent Blockchain Record
Scan with Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet