Čínská literárnost: pojem a téma // Chinese literariness: concept and theme
Abstract
The works of critics as dissimilar, in almost every other respect, as Shklovsky, Tynianov, Vodicka,
Paul de Man, etc. show the usefulness of “comparative approach” to the general concept of “literariness”,
however heterogeneously it may be put to work. The author of the essay argues that the distinction
Literariness vs. Literature corresponds with the idea of autonomous worlds of literariness
from the typological point of view in the global inequality; it presents the field of “comparative literature”
as a way of reading and re-reading in unexpected ways of devices and vices. Chinese literariness
as a typological, historically closed and theoretically productive in-between of Sinology and
comparative literature.
Keywords
Citation
ID:
105637
References
Blockchain Verification
Account:
NFT Contract Address:
0x95644003c57E6F55A65596E3D9Eac6813e3566dA
Article ID:
105637
Unique Identifier:
a1699aa5899a190b1be9fe4e3b8919bd
Network:
Scimatic Chain (ID: 481)
Loading...
Blockchain Readiness Checklist
Authors
Abstract
Journal Name
Year
Title
Creates 1,000,000 NFT tokens for this article
Token Features:
- ERC-1155 Standard NFT
- 1 Million Supply per Article
- Transferable via MetaMask
- Permanent Blockchain Record
Scan with Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet