Ultrasonography versus bioelectrical impedance analysis: which predicts muscle strength better?

Ultrasonography versus bioelectrical impedance analysis: which predicts muscle strength better?

Sengul Aycicek, Gozde;Ozsurekci, Cemile;Caliskan, Hatice;Kizilarslanoglu, Muhammet Cemal;Tuna Dogrul, Rana;Balci, Cafer;Unsal, Pelin;Esme, Mert;Yavuz, Burcu Balam;Cankurtaran, Mustafa;Halil, Meltem Gulhan;
Acta clinica Belgica 2019 pp. 1-5
272
sengul-aycicek2019ultrasonographyacta

Abstract

: Muscle strength seems to be more relevant to the functionality than muscle mass in sarcopenia. Different diagnostic techniques are available for the evaluation of muscle mass. Ultrasonography (USG) seems to have some advantages compared to other techniques especially bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA) including being not affected of the results by the factors like extreme body mass indexes (BMI) or hypervolemia. The aim of the study is to determine and compare the muscle strength prediction value of muscle mass measured by using USG or BIA and determine the cut-off values for the Turkish population.: One hundred and thirty six patients admitted to geriatrics outpatient clinic for comprehensive geriatric assessment were included in the study. Body composition was determined by BIA and skeletal muscle mass ındex (SMI) was measured. Thickness of the gastrocnemius muscle was measured via USG. Diagnosis of sarcopenia was made according to the EWSGOP 2 diagnostic criteria.: The best cut-off value for gastrocnemius muscle thickness to predict low HGS was ≤13.8 mm (AUC:0.690,p <0.001). SMI was not found to predict low HGS (AUC:0.573,p >0.05). Comparison of AUCs for gastrocnemius muscle thickness and SMI showed that gastrocnemius muscle thickness had higher AUC (p=0.008). For predicting sarcopenia, the best cut-off value of gastrocnemius muscle thickness was found to be ≤12.3 mm in women (AUC: 0.862,p <0.001) and ≤12.3 mm in men (AUC:0.900, p < 0.001).: In this study, we found that gastrocnemius thickness measured by USG seems to predict low HGS better than SMI measured by BIA.

Citation

ID: 72072
Ref Key: sengul-aycicek2019ultrasonographyacta
Use this key to autocite in SciMatic or Thesis Manager

References

Blockchain Verification

Account:
NFT Contract Address:
0x95644003c57E6F55A65596E3D9Eac6813e3566dA
Article ID:
72072
Unique Identifier:
10.1080/17843286.2019.1704989
Network:
Scimatic Chain (ID: 481)
Loading...
Blockchain Readiness Checklist
Authors
Abstract
Journal Name
Year
Title
5/5
Creates 1,000,000 NFT tokens for this article
Token Features:
  • ERC-1155 Standard NFT
  • 1 Million Supply per Article
  • Transferable via MetaMask
  • Permanent Blockchain Record
Blockchain QR Code
Scan with Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet

Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet