Comparison of CO2 Capture Approaches for Fossil-Based Power Generation: Review and Meta-Study

Comparison of CO2 Capture Approaches for Fossil-Based Power Generation: Review and Meta-Study

II, Thomas A. Adams;Hoseinzade, Leila;Madabhushi, Pranav Bhaswanth;Okeke, Ikenna J.;
processes 2017 Vol. 5 pp. 44-
384
ii2017comparisonprocesses

Abstract

This work is a meta-study of CO2 capture processes for coal and natural gas power generation, including technologies such as post-combustion solvent-based carbon capture, the integrated gasification combined cycle process, oxyfuel combustion, membrane-based carbon capture processes, and solid oxide fuel cells. A literature survey of recent techno-economic studies was conducted, compiling relevant data on costs, efficiencies, and other performance metrics. The data were then converted in a consistent fashion to a common standard (such as a consistent net power output, country of construction, currency, base year of operation, and captured CO2 pressure) such that a meaningful and direct comparison of technologies can be made. The processes were compared against a standard status quo power plant without carbon capture to compute metrics such as cost of CO2 emissions avoided to identify the most promising designs and technologies to use for CO2 emissions abatement.

Citation

ID: 72649
Ref Key: ii2017comparisonprocesses
Use this key to autocite in SciMatic or Thesis Manager

References

Blockchain Verification

Account:
NFT Contract Address:
0x95644003c57E6F55A65596E3D9Eac6813e3566dA
Article ID:
72649
Unique Identifier:
7a3739c4f8ed94ac5381c53ed2e45b1f
Network:
Scimatic Chain (ID: 481)
Loading...
Blockchain Readiness Checklist
Authors
Abstract
Journal Name
Year
Title
5/5
Creates 1,000,000 NFT tokens for this article
Token Features:
  • ERC-1155 Standard NFT
  • 1 Million Supply per Article
  • Transferable via MetaMask
  • Permanent Blockchain Record
Blockchain QR Code
Scan with Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet

Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet