Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis.
Current Language EN
English English Türkçe Türkçe Español Español Português Português Pусский Pусский Filipino Filipino Tiếng Việt Tiếng Việt हिन्दी हिन्दी العربية العربية বাংলা বাংলা Deutsch Deutsch 中文 中文

Comparison of major depression diagnostic classification probability using the SCID, CIDI, and MINI diagnostic interviews among women in pregnancy or postpartum: An individual participant data meta-analysis.

Levis, Brooke;McMillan, Dean;Sun, Ying;He, Chen;Rice, Danielle B;Krishnan, Ankur;Wu, Yin;Azar, Marleine;Sanchez, Tatiana A;Chiovitti, Matthew J;Bhandari, Parash Mani;Neupane, Dipika;Saadat, Nazanin;Riehm, Kira E;Imran, Mahrukh;Boruff, Jill T;Cuijpers, Pim;Gilbody, Simon;Ioannidis, John P A;Kloda, Lorie A;Patten, Scott B;Shrier, Ian;Ziegelstein, Roy C;Comeau, Liane;Mitchell, Nicholas D;Tonelli, Marcello;Vigod, Simone N;Aceti, Franca;Alvarado, Rubén;Alvarado-Esquivel, Cosme;Bakare, Muideen O;Barnes, Jacqueline;Beck, Cheryl Tatano;Bindt, Carola;Boyce, Philip M;Bunevicius, Adomas;Couto, Tiago Castro E;Chaudron, Linda H;Correa, Humberto;de Figueiredo, Felipe Pinheiro;Eapen, Valsamma;Fernandes, Michelle;Figueiredo, Barbara;Fisher, Jane R W;Garcia-Esteve, Lluïsa;Giardinelli, Lisa;Helle, Nadine;Howard, Louise M;Khalifa, Dina Sami;Kohlhoff, Jane;Kusminskas, Laima;Kozinszky, Zoltán;Lelli, Lorenzo;Leonardou, Angeliki A;Lewis, Beth A;Maes, Michael;Meuti, Valentina;Nakić Radoš, Sandra;Navarro García, Purificación;Nishi, Daisuke;Okitundu Luwa E-Andjafono, Daniel;Robertson-Blackmore, Emma;Rochat, Tamsen J;Rowe, Heather J;Siu, Bonnie W M;Skalkidou, Alkistis;Stein, Alan;Stewart, Robert C;Su, Kuan-Pin;Sundström-Poromaa, Inger;Tadinac, Meri;Tandon, S Darius;Tendais, Iva;Thiagayson, Pavaani;Töreki, Annamária;Torres-Giménez, Anna;Tran, Thach D;Trevillion, Kylee;Turner, Katherine;Vega-Dienstmaier, Johann M;Wynter, Karen;Yonkers, Kimberly A;Benedetti, Andrea;Thombs, Brett D;
international journal of methods in psychiatric research 2019 pp. e1803
280
levis2019comparisoninternational

Abstract

A previous individual participant data meta-analysis (IPDMA) identified differences in major depression classification rates between different diagnostic interviews, controlling for depressive symptoms on the basis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9. We aimed to determine whether similar results would be seen in a different population, using studies that administered the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in pregnancy or postpartum.Data accrued for an EPDS diagnostic accuracy IPDMA were analysed. Binomial generalised linear mixed models were fit to compare depression classification odds for the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI), Composite International Diagnostic Interview (CIDI), and Structured Clinical Interview for DSM (SCID), controlling for EPDS scores and participant characteristics.Among fully structured interviews, the MINI (15 studies, 2,532 participants, 342 major depression cases) classified depression more often than the CIDI (3 studies, 2,948 participants, 194 major depression cases; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 3.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.21, 11.43]). Compared with the semistructured SCID (28 studies, 7,403 participants, 1,027 major depression cases), odds with the CIDI (interaction aOR = 0.88, 95% CI [0.85, 0.92]) and MINI (interaction aOR = 0.95, 95% CI [0.92, 0.99]) increased less as EPDS scores increased.Different interviews may not classify major depression equivalently.

Keywords

depressive disorders major depression edinburgh postnatal depression scale diagnostic interviews individual participant data meta-analysis

Access

DOI:
10.1002/mpr.1803

Citation

ID: 56950
Ref Key: levis2019comparisoninternational
Use this key to autocite in SciMatic or Thesis Manager

References

References

No Bibliography

Blockchain Verification

Account:
NFT Contract Address:
0x95644003c57E6F55A65596E3D9Eac6813e3566dA
Article ID:
56950
Unique Identifier:
10.1002/mpr.1803
Network:
Scimatic Chain (ID: 481)
Blockchain Readiness Checklist
Authors
Abstract
Journal Name
Year
Title
5/5
Creates 1,000,000 NFT tokens for this article
Token Features:
  • ERC-1155 Standard NFT
  • 1 Million Supply per Article
  • Transferable via MetaMask
  • Permanent Blockchain Record
Blockchain QR Code
Scan with Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet
Gas fees required in SCI Coins
Buy SCI

Saymatik Web3.0 Wallet

Google Play
App Store