Over 150 mutations in the gene, which encodes the neuronal Nav1.2 protein, have been implicated in human epilepsy cases. Of these, R1882Q and R853Q are two of the most commonly reported mutations. This study utilized voltage-clamp electrophysiology to characterize the biophysical effects of the R1882Q and R853Q mutations on the hNav1.2 channel, including their effects on resurgent current and gating pore current, which are not typically investigated in the study of Nav1.2 channel mutations. HEK cells transiently transfected with DNA encoding either wild-type or mutant hNav1.2 revealed that the R1882Q mutation induced a gain-of-function phenotype, including slowed fast inactivation, depolarization of the voltage dependence of inactivation, and increased persistent current. In this model system, the R853Q mutation primarily produced loss-of-function effects, including reduced transient current amplitude and density, hyperpolarization of the voltage dependence of inactivation, and decreased persistent current. The presence of a Navβ4 peptide (KKLITFILKKTREK-OH) in the pipette solution induced resurgent currents, which were increased by the R1882Q mutation and decreased by the R853Q mutation. Further study of the R853Q mutation in oocytes indicated a reduced surface expression and revealed a robust gating pore current at negative membrane potentials, a function absent in the wild-type channel. This not only shows that different epileptogenic point mutations in hNav1.2 have distinct biophysical effects on the channel, but also illustrates that individual mutations can have complex consequences that are difficult to identify using conventional analyses. Distinct mutations may, therefore, require tailored pharmacotherapies in order to eliminate seizures. This study expands our understanding of the pathogenic biophysical effects associated with two common epilepsy mutations in the human neuronal voltage-gated sodium channel, hNav1.2. We show that different point mutations in hNav1.2 that are implicated in epilepsy syndromes have distinct biophysical effects on the channel, some of which are not revealed by standard electrophysiological analyses. The data herein suggests that alterations in resurgent currents and/or the creation of a gating pore, which is distinct from the central pore, may be involved in the mechanisms by which hNav1.2 mutations contribute to epilepsy and other problems. Uncovering the distinct mechanisms by which different mutations contribute to aberrant electrical activity will help us to develop more effective and personalized therapies for epileptic patients.