This study compared the membrane fouling mitigation in two novel types of biofilm membrane bioreactor coupled with a pre-anoxic tank (BF-AO-MBR)-namely a fixed biofilm membrane bioreactor (FB-MBR) with fiber bundle bio-carriers and a moving-bed biofilm membrane bioreactor (MB-MBR) with suspended bio-carriers-relative to an anoxic/oxic MBR (AO-MBR), at salinities ranging from zero to 60 g/L. The results showed that the FB-MBR mitigated membrane fouling to a greater degree than the MB-MBR and AO-MBR. During operation, the FB-MBR exhibited the lowest fouling development, with three membrane filtration cycles, while the AO-MBR and MB-MBR had 22 and nine cycles, respectively. The key fouling factor in all reactors was cake layer resistance (R), which contributed to 89.61, 62.20, and 83.17% of the total fouling resistance (R) in AO-MBR, FB-MBR and MB-MBR, respectively. Additionally, in the FB-MBR, the pore blocking resistance (30.07%) was also an important cause of fouling. Fiber bundle bio-carriers and suspended bio-carriers reduced the R by 37.68% and 21.24% (mainly the R) compared to that of AO-MBR. Furthermore, FB-MBR and MB-MBR caused a decrease of suspended biomass (80.14 and 15.90%, respectively), and the latter exhibited a higher sludge particle size than AO-MBR, possibly resulting in the cake layer decline. The studied BF-AO-MBRs further alleviated the fouling propensity by reducing the amount of soluble microbial product (SMP) and extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) under all salinity levels, especially the FB-MBR. Among the protein components, the amounts of tryptophan protein-like substance and aromatic protein-like substance were significantly lower in the FB-MBR compared to the AO-MBR and MB-MBR. Additionally, at 60 g/L salinity, the structure of the microbial community in the FB-MBR had a lower abundance of Bacteroidetes and more biomacromolecule degraders, which may have contributed to the moderation of membrane fouling.