Metacognitive Learning in Solving Mathematical Word Problems

Allocation at minting

The anchored record

Canonical JSON (keys sorted, no spaces, UTF-8). Its SHA-256 is the hash on chain. The abstract here is gemini shortened, not the author's own text.

{"abstract":"This study describes metacognitive solving strategies for mathematical word problems, anchored in two metacognitive components: knowledge of cognition and regulation of cognition. Students' declarative knowledge utilized strategies like activating concepts, identifying, and determining information, including reading, recalling, translating, identifying mathematical concepts, determining needed information, and understanding the leading question. Procedural knowledge involved substituting, representing, and organizing processes, such as substituting, using representation while solving, and organizing solutions coherently and logically. Conditional knowledge employed strategies like questioning the problem and their own practices, including consistent practice, assessing solution appropriateness, exploring solutions, and thinking of approaches. Regulation of cognition involved planning strategies like breaking down, illustrating, labeling, and thinking about information, formulas, and steps. Monitoring regulation included making sense of work and verifying solutions, such as having second thoughts, recognizing errors, checking work step-by-step, and reflecting. Evaluating regulation utilized reviewing and revising strategies, including reviewing calculations and procedures, checking answers, drawing conclusions, and revising solutions.","abstract_source":"gemini_shortened","authors":["Joseph Reyes","Zenaida Reyes"],"date":"2024-07-16","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.12751160","id":3246,"issue":2,"journal":{"issn":"2822-4353","name":"Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal"},"pdf_sha256":"b65b84eaa529a56c8210aff0cf400e3e1489dc93d90e5f4db0ac6a0e3f353779","schema":"scimatic-article/1","title":"Metacognitive Learning in Solving Mathematical Word Problems","volume":22}

Check it yourself

1. The record, from the token's own metadata:

printf '%s' "$(curl -s https://scimatic.org/nft/articles/3246.json | jq -r .canonical_record)" | sha256sum

2. The hash stored on chain (contentHash(3246)):

curl -s https://rpc.scimatic.net -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"eth_call","params":[{"to":"0x0E596B4bb924937aA35D9b342A90347ed6F05eF8","data":"0xf3e0c2900000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000cae"},"latest"]}'

The two must be equal (the second with a 0x in front).