SciMatic
Journals
Thesis Rep
Docs
Products
SciMatic.net
Journament
Journal Manager
Subjects
Thesis
ImProofer
Research Groups
Letter Pad
Conferences
Services
About
SciMatic
Team
Earn With Us
Join Us
Contact Us
EN
English
Türkçe
Español
Português
Pусский
Filipino
Tiếng Việt
हिन्दी
العربية
বাংলা
Deutsch
中文
Login
Keyword Connections
reply
Journals
0
No Journal Connected
Research Groups
0
No Research Group Connected
Bibliographies
203
1
Reply on "Characteristics and Survival of Korean Anal Cancer From the Korea Central Cancer Registry Data"
2
In Reply.
3
A reply to Hilal Khashan
4
Reply to: Fatih Canan "The relationship between internet addiction and eating disorders"
5
Reply to "HPV vaccine requirements, opt-outs and providers' support: Key studies missing from a recent systematic review".
6
Reply to Letter by Yarlioglues et al Entitled "Ethnicity and the Evaluation of Anthropometric Measurements".
7
Author's Reply to: “Design flaws in statins and pancreatic cancer research” (IJC-19-0941)
8
A reply to Peter Boghsonnian and James Lindsay's, ‘What comes after postmodernism?’
9
Two Tales of Civil Disobedience: A Reply to David Lefkowitz
10
In Reply.
11
Reply to Ahmad et al.: Understanding fascial plain blocks for breast cancer surgeries-Doses and volumes matter?
12
Author's Reply to Drs. Franco Scaldaferri and Valentina Petito, PhD
13
The author’s reply regarding “Clinical Behaviours and Prognoses of High and Low Risk Parotid Malignancies Based on Histology”
14
Reply.
15
Reply to the Letter: Increased bioavailability of plasma polyphenols via the intestinal fermentation of soybean fibers: a role for gut microbiome?
16
Reply to a Comment: Clinical Outcomes of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Eyes With a Glaucoma Drainage Device.
17
In Reply.
18
Hertz and the Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus: A reply to John Preston
19
Reply to the letter sent to the scientific editor of the journal of higher medical education about the article a methodology for assessing the quality of student training in the latin-american school of medicine
20
Reply to Venkataraju et al. ‘J Clin Anesth 2020;59:103–5’: Same discovery, two names. Our Parasacral interfascial plane block (PIPB) and your Parasacral ischial plane (PIP) block are identical
21
Tiger sharks eat songbirds: Reply.
22
Reply to the Letter to the Editor "Delayed Cord Clamping in Twin Pregnancies: to Do or Not to Do?"
23
The critical role of the research question, inclusion criteria, and transparency in meta-analyses of integrity test research: a reply to Harris et al. (2012) and Ones, Viswesvaran, and Schmidt (2012).
24
Paravertebral block and access to the paravertebral space - a reply
25
Women and Children First: Promoting Empowerment Through Resistance Education - Reply
26
Reply to “A Replication Study of ‘Openness, Country Size, and Government Size’ (Journal of Public Economics 2009)”
27
Kidney Sales and Market Regulation: A Reply to Semrau.
28
Reply to Mr. Cuming.
29
Mr. Cuming, in Reply to Academicus.
30
In reply to: About “MRI-based determination of occlusal splint thickness for temporomandibular joint disk derangement: a randomized controlled clinical trial”
31
Author's reply: To PMID 21887581.
32
Ranjit Daniels and Vishwanath Patil reply:
33
Reply to Templeton, Thomas; Hodges, Ashley; Templeton, Leah; Goenaga-Diaz, Eduardo, regarding their comment 'Shakespeare, perioperative respiratory adverse events, COLDS, and the room air oxygen saturation: "All's well that ends well"
34
Reply to "The Connection between Celiac Disease and Hepatic Steatosis: High Levels of Pigment Epithelium-Derived Factor".
35
Reply to H. McLeod et al.
36
Reply to Chandra et al.
37
Questions of Stability — The Authors Reply
38
Reply.
39
Reply to “Letter to Editor regarding the article “Evaluation of the phytotoxicity of conventional and biodegradable plastic bags using seed germination tests” by Balestri et al. (2019) published on Ecological Indicators 102 (2019): 569–580”
40
Reply to Xueliang Zhou and Xinwei Han's Letter to the Editor re: Thomas Van den Broeck, Roderick C.N. van den Bergh, Nicolas Arfi, et al. Prognostic Value of Biochemical Recurrence Following Treatment with Curative Intent for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review. Eur Urol 2019;75:967–87
41
Comment to the reply letter: Letter to the Editor: Preference option randomized design (PORD) for comparative effectiveness research: Statistical power for testing comparative effect, preference effect, selection effect, intent-to-treat effect, and overall effect (SMMR, Vol. 28, Issue 2, 2019)
42
Authors' reply: Letter to the Editor: Preference option randomized design (PORD) for comparative effectiveness research: Statistical power for testing comparative effect, preference effect, selection effect, intent-to-treat effect, and overall effect (SMMR, Vol. 28, Issue 2, 2019)
43
Reply to “Letter to the Editor” intent of surgery of the primary tumor in metastatic breast cancer remains palliative
44
Reply to Mupepele and Dormann 'Evidence Ranking Needs to Reflect Causality'.
45
Reply to comments by A. Pantokratoras on ““Electrokinetically modulated peristaltic transport of power-law fluids” by Prakash Goswami, Jeevanjyoti Chakraborty, Aditya Bandopadhyay, Suman Chakraborty, Microvascular Research 103 (2016) 41-54”, Microvascular Research (2019)
46
Letter: the gluten-free diet as a bottom-up approach for irritable bowel syndrome. Authors' reply.
47
Reply to the editorial: Can we currently and confidently assess the true burden of illness due to non-radiographic axial spondyloarthritis? by S. van der Linden and M.A. Khan
48
Reply to "contribution of inner-sphere reorganization in electron transfer reaction in solution" by S.U.M. Khan and J.O'M. Bockris
49
Reply to "The mortality and blood transfusion".
50
Reply to the discussion by Granier of Vincent et al., (2018) (Marine and Petroleum Geology, 91, 639–657)
51
Response to "Reply to: 'The decreasing predictive power of MELD in an era of changing etiology of liver disease'".
52
A reply to Hilal Khashan
53
Authors' reply to discussion of "prediction of shrinkage pore volume fraction using a dimensionless niyama criterion"
54
‘Determinants of in-hospital antibiotic prescription behaviour’ – Author's reply
55
Reply to the editor for the comment regarding the paper: High levels of faecal contamination in drinking groundwater and recreational water due to poor sanitation, in the sub-rural neighbourhoods of Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of the Congo by Kayembe et al., 2018
56
Reply from the authors: Accountability and leadership changes culture—yes, even for lymph nodes
57
Reply to Simon and Reed: Independent and converging results rule out historic disturbance and confirm age constraints for Barrier Canyon rock art
58
Reply to Weihmann: Fifty gazelles do not equal an elephant, and other ecological misunderstandings.
59
In Reply to "No Article an Island: Letter in Response to 'Social Media in Neurosurgery: Using ResearchGate'".
60
Reply: The Difference between Trends and Standards on Gluteal Aesthetics: The Impact of Social Media on Beauty Preferences.
61
Reply to the letter by Singer, Mitter, and Porsch related to our paper "benefits of individualized feedback in internet-based interventions for depression: A randomized controlled trial"
62
Authors' Reply to "Working Together to Heal Our Physician Well-Being Crisis".
63
Reply to Drs. Kiaei and Molinaro Regarding the Publication "Comparison of a Bridge Immunoassay with Two Bioassays for Thyrotropin Receptor Antibody Detection and Differentiation".
64
REPLY TO LETTER.
65
Acute Severe Hypertension. Reply.
66
Secondary Surgical Cytoreduction for Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. Reply.
67
Triple Therapy for Cystic Fibrosis with a Phe508del CFTR Mutation. Reply.
68
Reply to "Risk adjustment in Home Health Care CAHPS".
69
Reply to Depression and Bone Mineral Density.
70
Reply to: Did antiphospholipid antibodies limit intervention efficacy for postoperative total knee arthroplasty-related thrombotic event prevention?
71
Reply to The Letter to the Editors (ACR-19-1134) Opioid Use in Patients with Acute Gout.
72
Supply Chain Optimization and Waste Reduction-Reply.
73
Testing the quantity theory of money in Greece: Reply to Özmen
74
Reply to discussion on "River flow estimation from upstream flow records by artificial intelligence methods" by M.E. Turan and M.A. Yurdusev [J. Hydrol. 369 (2009) 71-77]
75
Reply to “Comment on Tailleux, R. Neutrality Versus Materiality: A Thermodynamic Theory of Neutral Surfaces. Fluids 2016, 1, 32.”
76
Reply to Comment on Oldenburg, M., Jensen, H.J. Stress and Strain among Seafarers Related to the Occupational Groups. , doi:10.3390/ijerph16071153.
77
Reply to: "Biologics for psoriasis during COVID-19 outbreak".
78
Reply to "COVID-19, syphilis and biologic therapies for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: A word of caution".
79
Stability and Viability of SARS-CoV-2. Reply.
80
Reply to the rebuttal to: Li et al. "Dynamic analysis of international green behavior from the perspective of the mapping knowledge domain," Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 26, pp. 6087-6098.
81
Reply to "Ethical Principles Governing Organ Transplantation Apply to Paired Exchange Programs".
82
Reply to: Understanding treatment options in craniopharyngioma better
83
Response to "Reply to 'Varicella-like exanthem as a specific COVID-19-associated skin manifestation: multicenter case series of 22 patients': To consider varicella-like exanthem associated with COVID-19, virus varicella zoster and virus herpes simplex must be ruled out".
84
Electron microscopy of SARS-CoV-2: a challenging task - Authors' reply.
85
Reply to letter to the editor.
86
Editorial, Authors Reply: Neurological Impact of Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19): Practical Considerations for the Neuroscience Community.
87
Reply to Byung Kwan Park's Letter to the Editor re: Baris Turkbey, Andrew B. Rosenkrantz, Masoom A. Haider, et al. Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1: 2019 Update of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2. Eur Urol 2019;76:329–40
88
[Authors reply].
89
Reply to Letter to the Editor "Combined Antidepressant Treatment: A Risk Factor for Switching in Bipolar Patients"
90
Author reply: No immediate increase in morbidity of infants delivered by term cesarean section for placenta previa: some concerns
91
Reply to Newton et al
92
Dr van Dongen-Boomsma and Colleagues Reply
93
Reply to Lawn et al
94
Reply to Lagier et al
95
Author reply: No immediate increase in morbidity of infants delivered by term cesarean section for placenta previa: some concerns.
96
Reply to Lee et al
97
Intersection patterns of human coronary veins and arteries: reply
98
Reply to Letter to the Editor "Sexual Dysfunction on Fluvoxamine Therapy"
99
Reply to Davido et al
100
Reply to Theilacker et al
101
A reply to Dr. Elmhirst's discussion of "Primitive defenses: cognitive aspects and therapeutic handling".