Role of Digital Tools and Administrative Efficiency in Basic Education: A Basis for Tech-Driven Administrative Optimization Training Plan

Allocation at minting

The anchored record

Canonical JSON (keys sorted, no spaces, UTF-8). Its SHA-256 is the hash on chain.

{"abstract":"This study examined the correlation between digital tool usage and administrative efficiency among administrators and teachers using a convergent parallel design. Quantitative analysis through multiple and multivariate multiple regression revealed significant models: digital tool usage explained 41.2% of the variance (Adjusted R² = .389), and administrative efficiency explained 39.6% (Adjusted R² = .373). Combined analysis indicated predictors significantly accounted for variance across both outcomes, Wilks’ Λ = 0.672, F(10, 226) = 4.94, p < .001, partial η² = .179. Among demographics, Position/Rank, Years of Experience, and Training Attended emerged as significant factors. Even when controlling for these, strong correlations persisted: digital tool usage (p = .001), administrative efficiency (p = .001), and group membership effects (p = .001), leading to the rejection of HO1, HO2, and HO3. Qualitative content analysis highlighted both enabling and constraining factors, including: Infrastructure and Access; Training and Digital Literacy; Perceived Usefulness; Time and Workload; Resistance and Attitudes; Demographics and Adoption; Training as a Mediator; Reliability and Motivation; Role-Specific Tool Relevance; and Feedback Loop. Triangulation through meta-inference confirmed parallel relationships across quantitative and qualitative findings, underscoring the central role of digital tools in shaping efficiency outcomes. It recommends developing and implementing a Tech-Driven Administrative Optimization Training Plan to address skill gaps, strengthen digital literacy, and institutionalize the effective use of technology in school management.","abstract_source":"original","authors":["Mary Rose Presbitero","Daisy Obiso"],"date":"2025-12-22","doi":"10.70838/pemj.500907","id":6947,"issue":9,"journal":{"issn":"2822-4353","name":"Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal"},"pdf_sha256":"04432e1f85c3e4806e97e861d64055fbe715116ef538b706a4d933c0eb5f2403","schema":"scimatic-article/1","title":"Role of Digital Tools and Administrative Efficiency in Basic Education: A Basis for Tech-Driven Administrative Optimization Training Plan","volume":50}

Check it yourself

1. The record, from the token's own metadata:

printf '%s' "$(curl -s https://scimatic.org/nft/articles/6947.json | jq -r .canonical_record)" | sha256sum

2. The hash stored on chain (contentHash(6947)):

curl -s https://rpc.scimatic.net -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"eth_call","params":[{"to":"0x0E596B4bb924937aA35D9b342A90347ed6F05eF8","data":"0xf3e0c2900000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001b23"},"latest"]}'

The two must be equal (the second with a 0x in front).