Learning Inquiry Strategies and Learners' Knowledge Retention

Allocation at minting

The anchored record

Canonical JSON (keys sorted, no spaces, UTF-8). Its SHA-256 is the hash on chain.

{"abstract":"This study investigated the correlations between learning inquiry strategies and knowledge retention among Grade 6 learners in District 2 of Maramag, Bukidnon, for the 2024-2025 school year. Specifically, it evaluated the level of various learning inquiry strategies—questioning techniques, hands-on activities, scaffolding and guidance, authentic materials, and reflection—and their impact on learners' knowledge retention. A descriptive-correlational research design was used, with 256 learners selected through simple random sampling. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, and Pearson product-moment correlation. Findings revealed that questioning techniques and hands-on activities were rated high, while scaffolding, authentic materials, and reflection were rated very high. This highlights the effectiveness of interactive, practical, and real-world learning experiences in fostering student engagement and understanding. Additionally, knowledge retention among learners was high, suggesting that diverse and active learning methods support effective retention. A significant correlation was found between inquiry strategies and knowledge retention, underscoring the value of combining questioning, hands-on activities, structured guidance, authentic materials, and reflective practices. These findings suggest that incorporating a variety of evidence-based instructional strategies can enhance student engagement and improve knowledge retention, making them valuable tools for teachers aiming to optimize learning outcomes.","abstract_source":"original","authors":["Ronie Galeno Ponce","Leo Jade Bayon Matalubos"],"date":"2025-09-23","doi":"10.70838/pemj.470307","id":6434,"issue":3,"journal":{"issn":"2822-4353","name":"Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal"},"pdf_sha256":"147d8ef514c47f2a0248d143077cab5b2df8342a2e3f4acdea32deffe3e4a090","schema":"scimatic-article/1","title":"Learning Inquiry Strategies and Learners' Knowledge Retention","volume":47}

Check it yourself

1. The record, from the token's own metadata:

printf '%s' "$(curl -s https://scimatic.org/nft/articles/6434.json | jq -r .canonical_record)" | sha256sum

2. The hash stored on chain (contentHash(6434)):

curl -s https://rpc.scimatic.net -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"eth_call","params":[{"to":"0x0E596B4bb924937aA35D9b342A90347ed6F05eF8","data":"0xf3e0c2900000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001922"},"latest"]}'

The two must be equal (the second with a 0x in front).