← Back to the article

SciMatic · SciChain record

Ability Estimation Using the Classical Test Theory and Three-Parameter Item Response Theory Model

Bayah Amiruddin, Mercedita Langamin
Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal · 2022-09-09 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.7063805
Token #570
✓ Verified on SciChain. The record below hashes to exactly the content hash stored on chain for token #570.
Token#570 of SciMatic Articles (ERC-1155), fixed supply 1,000,000
Contract0x0E596B4bb924937aA35D9b342A90347ed6F05eF8
Mint transaction0x8a718ea8c3af79e5565b52649200ac8ff50e8c0c093b63629fce0c7a95338062 · block 12096884
Minted2026-10-01 17:16 UTC
Hash on chain0x7fa8863704a3a32859d1c7a3ece856973c2712b6c483e1774d1812a7ce882a04
SHA-256 of the record0x7fa8863704a3a32859d1c7a3ece856973c2712b6c483e1774d1812a7ce882a04
Article today Matches the anchored record.

Allocation at minting

HolderWalletMintedHolds now
SciMatic (10%) 0xc35709AB…277732 100,000 100,000
Bayah Amiruddin 0xBca1c6e9…fE7A0d 450,000 450,000
Mercedita Langamin 0x3ff2E67c…7A7452 450,000 450,000

The anchored record

Canonical JSON (keys sorted, no spaces, UTF-8). Its SHA-256 is the hash on chain.

{"abstract":"This study aimed to estimate and compare the academic abilities of the students using the Classical Test Theory (CTT) and the Item-Response Theory (IRT) models. Specifically, the Bayesian modal or maximum a posteriori (MAP) under the three-parameter logistic model of IRT was used as ability estimator. The study involved a total of 52 Grade 11 students in a descriptive-quantitative approach using Microsoft Excel, R, and SPSS software in the data calculation. The findings revealed that 30 (57.69%) students passed and 22 (42.31%) failed under the CTT approach. However, under the IRT approach, 34 (65.38%) passed while the remaining 18 failed. Moreover, when the CTT and IRT results were compared, it produced significant results indicating that transmuted grades of the students were higher under IRT than CTT. Furthermore, the results of the two approaches showed significant relationship further providing a better picture of the comparison. In this study, IRT appeared to provide more details/information about student performances/abilities than the CTT and thus the use of IRT in the ability estimation is recommended. In addition, Bayesian modal or MAP appeared to work well as ability estimator and thus its employment is likewise encouraged.","abstract_source":"original","authors":["Bayah Amiruddin","Mercedita Langamin"],"date":"2022-09-09","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.7063805","id":570,"issue":3,"journal":{"issn":"2822-4353","name":"Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal"},"pdf_sha256":"6be2807242f76398d1c99ceafc2ce53a3cc56ab1da9807149aab3fafb3635d34","schema":"scimatic-article/1","title":"Ability Estimation Using the Classical Test Theory and Three-Parameter Item Response Theory Model","volume":4}

Check it yourself

1. The record, from the token's own metadata:

printf '%s' "$(curl -s https://scimatic.org/nft/articles/570.json | jq -r .canonical_record)" | sha256sum

2. The hash stored on chain (contentHash(570)):

curl -s https://rpc.scimatic.net -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"eth_call","params":[{"to":"0x0E596B4bb924937aA35D9b342A90347ed6F05eF8","data":"0xf3e0c290000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000023a"},"latest"]}'

The two must be equal (the second with a 0x in front).