← Back to the article

SciMatic · SciChain record

Perspectives on Program Accreditation: Lived Experiences of Faculty from State University External Campuses

Celia Ignacio, Niclie Tiratira, Luningning DeCastro, Vivian Buhain, Luzale Henson, Ronnie Cainglet, Ligaya DelRosario
Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal · 2025-02-18 · DOI 10.5281/zenodo.14885221
Token #4522
✓ Verified on SciChain. The record below hashes to exactly the content hash stored on chain for token #4522.
Token#4522 of SciMatic Articles (ERC-1155), fixed supply 1,000,000
Contract0x0E596B4bb924937aA35D9b342A90347ed6F05eF8
Mint transaction0x612cafbe86ca1a930ddcb2e06c1509d221e2a03d47b81a0b3ec4034510515030 · block 12103563
Minted2026-10-02 02:32 UTC
Hash on chain0xb1eea1bb2de849e72c108616da3aea1651ae4ff70215886eab9c690722e946ea
SHA-256 of the record0xb1eea1bb2de849e72c108616da3aea1651ae4ff70215886eab9c690722e946ea
Article today Matches the anchored record.

Allocation at minting

HolderWalletMintedHolds now
SciMatic (10%) 0xc35709AB…277732 100,000 100,000
Celia Ignacio 0xD8504786…dC652c 128,574 128,574
Niclie Tiratira 0xFBEC9439…477B9e 128,571 128,571
Luningning DeCastro 0x3A2C0777…783a39 128,571 128,571
Vivian Buhain 0xcB9744C2…5be34B 128,571 128,571
Luzale Henson 0xdaFB8fea…Db9A61 128,571 128,571
Ronnie Cainglet 0xffef160A…3B1103 128,571 128,571
Ligaya DelRosario 0xEA0A6812…37E775 128,571 128,571

The anchored record

Canonical JSON (keys sorted, no spaces, UTF-8). Its SHA-256 is the hash on chain.

{"abstract":"Accreditation is an ongoing process managed by the Commission on Higher Education (CHED), aimed at maintaining quality standards in HEIs. State universities with external campuses undergo both program and institutional accreditation, with faculty playing key roles in ensuring quality. The dissertation aimed to determine the perspectives on program accreditation of faculty from state university external campuses. The lived experiences of the faculty were drawn by getting their responses to the three research questions that delved into the program accreditation experiences, challenges encountered, and the participant’s views on how to prepare their campus for the next program accreditation. This qualitative research used the hermeneutic phenomenological design. Data were gathered through in-depth interviews. Triangulation was made to validate the data using field notes, reflexive journals, documentary analysis, and validation from other data sources. The data collection procedures were meticulously performed. Data gathered were analyzed following the Thematic Analysis procedures by Moustakas (1994) and the use of QDA miner software. From the analyses, six themes emerged: Experience-Based Definitions and Impressions on Program Accreditation, Work in Accreditation: The Overkill, Challenges Encountered in Program Accreditation, Causes of Program Accreditation Issues, Applied Strategies in Overcoming Accreditation Challenges, and Towards a Successful Program Accreditation: Bolman and Deal’s Four-Frame Model. From these themes and the theoretical underpinnings of the study, it was found that the perspectives of faculty on program accreditation differ based on their experiences. The faculty had clear ideas on how difficult the work in accreditation is, the problems they encountered, the reasons why the challenges were met, the strategies they applied to overcome the challenges, and their set of recommendations that were classified by the researcher using the Bolman and Deal’s Four-Frame Model.","abstract_source":"original","authors":["Celia Ignacio","Niclie Tiratira","Luningning DeCastro","Vivian Buhain","Luzale Henson","Ronnie Cainglet","Ligaya DelRosario"],"date":"2025-02-18","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.14885221","id":4522,"issue":3,"journal":{"issn":"2822-4353","name":"Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal"},"pdf_sha256":"6bb85348a2f77ba540af7efcf4638c33d772e8ae81edbf3ed4662c7081aa13df","schema":"scimatic-article/1","title":"Perspectives on Program Accreditation: Lived Experiences of Faculty from State University External Campuses","volume":32}

Check it yourself

1. The record, from the token's own metadata:

printf '%s' "$(curl -s https://scimatic.org/nft/articles/4522.json | jq -r .canonical_record)" | sha256sum

2. The hash stored on chain (contentHash(4522)):

curl -s https://rpc.scimatic.net -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"eth_call","params":[{"to":"0x0E596B4bb924937aA35D9b342A90347ed6F05eF8","data":"0xf3e0c29000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000011aa"},"latest"]}'

The two must be equal (the second with a 0x in front).