Performance in CPA Licensure Examination of DWCSJ Graduates: A Proposed Intervention

Allocation at minting

The anchored record

Canonical JSON (keys sorted, no spaces, UTF-8). Its SHA-256 is the hash on chain. The abstract here is gemini shortened, not the author's own text.

{"abstract":"This descriptive-correlational study defined the performance of DWCSJ graduates in the CPA Licensure Examination, assessing the relationship between their profiles (grades in major subjects, IQ level, EQ status, socioeconomic status) and attitude towards CPA review, and their examination performance. Data were gathered using a questionnaire for socioeconomic status, EQ status, and attitude towards CPA review, and from registrar records for grades and guidance counselor records for IQ levels. Multiple-regression stepwise technique was used for analysis. Results indicated that grades in major subjects, EQ status, socioeconomic status, and attitude towards CPA review were the best indicators of good performance. The null hypothesis of no significant relationship between respondents’ profiles (except IQ level) and performance, and between attitude towards CPA review and performance, was rejected. It is concluded that grades in major subjects, emotional quotient status, socioeconomic status, and attitude towards CPA review likely affect performance in the CPA Licensure Examination. Recommendations include strictly implementing retention policy, devising programs for emotional quotient, strengthening JPIA’s incentive program, and increasing awareness of the right attitude towards CPA review to improve passing percentages.","abstract_source":"gemini_shortened","authors":["Mark Jing Tayactac"],"date":"2024-05-19","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.11217400","id":2939,"issue":1,"journal":{"issn":"2822-4353","name":"Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal"},"pdf_sha256":"8270582833c0df836bcc743bca3f84f2e3bbd6a49551de0fd19633c5de887e1f","schema":"scimatic-article/1","title":"Performance in CPA Licensure Examination of DWCSJ Graduates: A Proposed Intervention","volume":20}

Check it yourself

1. The record, from the token's own metadata:

printf '%s' "$(curl -s https://scimatic.org/nft/articles/2939.json | jq -r .canonical_record)" | sha256sum

2. The hash stored on chain (contentHash(2939)):

curl -s https://rpc.scimatic.net -H 'content-type: application/json' \
  -d '{"jsonrpc":"2.0","id":1,"method":"eth_call","params":[{"to":"0x0E596B4bb924937aA35D9b342A90347ed6F05eF8","data":"0xf3e0c2900000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000b7b"},"latest"]}'

The two must be equal (the second with a 0x in front).